By Plenary Sessions: Züleyxa Izmailova

The speaker is highly active at the plenary session, repeatedly asking questions on various topics within a short timeframe and engaging in procedural disputes (requesting the floor for a point of order). This pattern of activity suggests an active opposition questioner on the floor.

The speaker's pattern of activity suggests persistence and consistent follow-up, as evidenced by the issue first arising last autumn and the subsequent appeal to the Data Protection Inspectorate. This demonstrates the speaker's willingness to utilize multiple oversight mechanisms to obtain the required information.

The politician actively participated in plenary sessions on two consecutive days (June 11 and 12), repeatedly raising questions and stating positions regarding the supplementary budget and amendments to the Labor Law. This pattern of activity suggests focused engagement in the debates surrounding crucial draft legislation.

Insufficient data.

All three speeches were delivered on the same day during a plenary session, which indicates active participation in exercising the Riigikogu's oversight function. The pattern of activity involves questioning high-ranking state officials (the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and a minister) on critical policy and rule of law issues.

The pattern of activity demonstrates systematic parliamentary oversight, evidenced by the submission of an interpellation with the Social Democrats on April 14 and the subsequent active presentation of follow-up questions during the plenary session on June 2. This indicates a structured approach to holding the government accountable. The speaker is an active questioner and initiator during Riigikogu sessions.