By Plenary Sessions: Martin Helme

The speaker demonstrates knowledge of Riigikogu procedures (expressing a vote of no confidence, amending the transcript) and constitutional principles, particularly regarding freedom of religion and the separation of powers. In economic matters, the focus is on criticizing the lack of budget transparency and unrealistic forecasts, referencing the standpoints of the Chancellor of Justice and the Auditor General.

The speaker demonstrates authority on the subjects of political culture and ministerial responsibility, citing transcripts from the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament). He also employs specific demographic terminology, framing the issue of Ukrainian refugees as mass immigration and a demographic threat to Estonia. He emphasizes that Estonia has the smallest population among the nation-states in Europe.

The speaker demonstrates authority on economic matters, referencing the length and severity of the Estonian recession and comparing it to other European countries (Latvia, Lithuania, the Nordics). Furthermore, they are familiar with the Riigikogu's rules of procedure and procedural regulations, criticizing the conduct of the session chair and the minister when answering questions. Additionally, they are aware of the government's internal political narratives and the role of specific officials (Priit Kama).

The speaker demonstrates awareness of the specific monetary figures related to social cuts (e.g., 18 million euros saved) and major expenditure items in the state budget (200 million for aid to Ukraine, 300 million for NGOs). Also evident is knowledge of legislative principles, particularly the prohibition against resolving individual cases and the procedural rules concerning the setting of deadlines for amendments. The speaker claims to know the Estonian constitution better than the members of the government.

The speaker demonstrates knowledge of the principles of penal law and the expungement of criminal record data, using terminology such as "recidivist offense type" and "the sentence has been spent." The expert analysis is focused on a detailed review of the bill's content within the context of social security, explaining what a "clean slate" means in this specific situation.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in the details of social sector financing and the transition to the Health Insurance Fund, utilizing financial terminology like "components" and "total sum." Their arguments rely on criticism from the Association of Providers of Special Welfare Services, which lends specific authority to their viewpoints.

The speaker demonstrates knowledge of economic and fiscal policy, citing specific shifts in GDP and state budget volumes (€40B/€36B and €16B/€20B) and referencing historical parallels (the Soviet Union’s 70% redistribution, Reagan’s definition of socialism). Furthermore, he is familiar with specific national projects such as Rail Baltic, the oil shale industry, and phosphorite exploration. He utilizes data regarding mass immigration figures (over 150,000 immigrants) to bolster his arguments.

The speaker demonstrates a high level of expertise in infrastructure planning and financing, citing specific figures like the 2013 EU commitment and the 2030 deadline for the Via Baltica project. He utilizes statistics concerning fuel excise tax revenue (521 million euros) and the effect of inflation (40% inflation compared to an additional 10–15 million euros) on the road maintenance budget. Furthermore, the speaker draws a distinction between major four-lane highway projects and short, few-kilometer segments, which he considers inadequate.