By Plenary Sessions: Martin Helme

The speaker is highly active during the Riigikogu (Parliament) information session, using this platform to sharply criticize government policy and demand accountability. Their patterns of activity demonstrate a direct linkage between domestic politics and the issues surrounding the European Parliament elections, asking questions regarding the rationale for supporting specific candidates.

The activity pattern is linked to the plenary session, where both substantive questions are posed to government representatives and procedural motions are submitted. The speaker, on behalf of the parliamentary group, requested a ten-minute recess before the vote and asked for procedural clarifications regarding the possibility of extending that recess.

The speaker's pattern of activity involves submitting formal queries (interpellations) and subsequently pressing for answers, specifically citing one particular query that was submitted nearly a year ago (on June 14, 2023). This demonstrates a strong focus on long-term parliamentary oversight and demanding accountability. The speaker is active during plenary sessions, often posing pointed follow-up questions to ministers.

We do not have sufficient data on the activity patterns, as the analysis is based solely on a single speech fragment from a plenary session.

Insufficient data. (One intervention during the plenary session has been documented.)

The speaker was highly active during the May 9th plenary session, submitting repeated questions and delivering a lengthy presentation on the topic of e-elections. He/She referenced earlier actions, such as demanding data from the State Information System Authority (RIA) and the Electoral Service, and is planning further steps. Future plans include appealing to the President if the Riigikogu does not support making an appeal to the Venice Commission.

The speaker is actively participating in the Riigikogu information hour (Q&A session), utilizing this platform for sharp criticism of the government and for posing questions. He/She references the Prime Minister's recent regional visits (Türi, Võru) and the resulting public reaction, which suggests active media scrutiny.

The speeches were delivered during the Riigikogu plenary session in connection with a motion of no confidence, signaling intense legislative activity. The substance of the speeches reflects a rapid response to recent events, such as the exam disruptions in April and the teachers' strike in January, demonstrating a pattern of immediate reaction to crises that have arisen in the public sphere.