By Plenary Sessions: Mart Helme

There is a complete lack of any indication of cooperation or willingness to compromise; the style is purely oppositional and aggressive, focusing on exposing the incompetence of the government's policies and its ministers.

The working style is focused on the intra-factional decision-making process, which is intended to result in a proposal to interrupt the debate on the draft bill. There is no information available regarding the seeking of compromises or cooperation with non-governmental bodies or between political parties.

Not enough data

The style of cooperation is inquisitive and dialogic, seeking feedback and clarifications from the opposing party regarding the content of the draft proposal. This demonstrates a readiness to engage with the subject matter and gather information, even if the initial stance was against processing the proposal.

Insufficient data.

The cooperation style demonstrates support for colleagues with similar viewpoints (Mr. Valge, Mr. Grünthal), whose arguments are compelling and substantiated. There is a complete lack of openness to compromise with the opposing side, who are considered the destroyers of the Estonian nation-state.

There is a complete lack of willingness to cooperate; the speaker's primary mode of communication is confrontation and accusation. He/She is setting conditions for potential future coalition partners (Isamaa, EKRE, Keskerakond) regarding the abolition of the car tax.

Not enough data

The speaker stresses the need for parliamentary dialogue that also takes into account the opposition’s positions and draft legislation. Cooperation with the current government is completely absent, as the government is accused of tossing the opposition’s bills in the trash and continuing along a voluntaristic path.

No data available

The speaker references prior coalition experience, noting that the decision regarding the 30 million support was reached "following heated debates," demonstrating an ability to make decisions despite internal tensions. In the current situation, he supports the investigative work being done by his Center Party colleague, but his overall tone remains confrontational and uncompromising, demanding that opponents back the investigative committee to clear up any suspicions.