By Plenary Sessions: Helle-Moonika Helme

The primary targets are the Prime Minister and the Reform Party, who stand accused of financially devastating the state, jeopardizing national security, and imposing ideological projects. The criticism operates on both the political level (the green transition, Rail Baltic) and the personal level (the Prime Minister’s perceived absence and her intention to leave the country). These attacks are intense and uncompromising, specifically accusing the major parties of having abolished the border guard over the course of 30 years.

The opposition is aimed squarely at the Reform Party, Eesti 200, and the Social Democrats, who stand accused of lying and damaging the cost of living for the Estonian people. The criticism is both political (tax hikes, budget deficit) and personal, specifically accusing Jürgen Ligi of personally harassing pensioners and Kaja Kallas of dishonesty. The opposition’s stance is uncompromising, urging voters not to support the ruling parties.

The main opponent is the government led by the Reform Party and its ministers, who are accused of breaking promises and failing in their oversight duties. The criticism is intense and personal, directly linking members of the governing party (Rain Rosimannus, Martin Kukk) to the care home scandals and accusing the minister of "dragging their feet."

The primary opponents are the government (Kaja Kallas is specifically mentioned), green ideologues, and lobbyists representing wind energy companies. The criticism is intense, accusing them of negligence, serving corrupt business interests, and overriding the rights of both people and nature. There is no apparent willingness to compromise; rather, every effort is being made to obstruct the bill's legislative process.

The primary opponent is Prime Minister Kaja Kallas and her government, who stand accused of both violating the constitutional order and destroying the economy. The criticism is intense, encompassing both political grievances (immigration, the budget) and personal attacks (business ties to Russia, being out of touch with reality). Compromise is ruled out, with demands focused solely on the Prime Minister's resignation ("Step aside!").

The primary criticism is leveled against the security agencies (KAPO), who stand accused of clumsily muddling facts and outright fabrication. The assault is intense and casts doubt on the general competence of the agencies, raising the question of whether they simply lack the ability to do their jobs. The criticism targets the quality of work and the trustworthiness of these institutions.

No data available

The primary opponent is the Reform Party and the government led by Kaja Kallas, specifically the Minister of Education and Research Kristina Kallas, against whom a motion of no confidence recently failed. The criticism is intense, centering on political failures, ideological deviation (internationalism), and personal history (a reference to Siim Kallas’s communist background). The government’s actions are being labeled as activities against the constitutional order, thereby precluding any possibility of compromise.

The primary criticism is aimed at the government, which is accused of failing to secure state budget funds for crucial cultural sites and of the unreasonable squandering of resources. There is also strong opposition directed at "agencies and certain forces," including the National Heritage Board, who are accused of deliberate obstruction and using underhanded tactics (such as the image of the "red cube") to influence public opinion.

The primary opponent is Minister of Education Kristina Kallas and the Reform Party-led government. Criticism is leveled on both political grounds (leadership failures, mass migration) and personal and moral grounds (the smear campaign against the chancellor, the unsuitability of new teachers, and the minister's campaign videos). The opposition is intense and uncompromising, directly accusing the government of constitutional violation and the promotion of internationalism.