By Plenary Sessions: Helle-Moonika Helme

Neither a desire for cooperation nor a readiness for compromise is evident. The speaker’s style is purely confrontational, posing sharp questions to the government and demanding the immediate halting of major projects (Rail Baltic).

The cooperative style demonstrates internal cohesion within the opposition, as the speaker acknowledges their colleague Helir-Valdor Seeder for adding an additional point (state fees) from the floor. There is no evidence of a willingness to compromise or cooperate with the ruling coalition, which is referred to as "the party of liars."

Insufficient data.

The cooperation is clearly intra-factional, as demonstrated by the proposal to suspend the second reading of the bill on behalf of the EKRE faction. Strategic cooperation is evident in the decision to take a recess for discussions with Mart Helme and the subsequent demand for a vote on the amendments proposed by other opposition colleagues (Arvo Aller, Rain Epler, Leo Kunnas). Cooperation with the coalition is not sought.

Not enough data.

Not enough data

The style of collaboration is formal and is directed toward the presiding officer of the session, who must be asked for permission to take procedural steps (such as a recess). There are no direct references to inter-party cooperation or willingness to compromise in the speeches.

No data available. The speaker focuses on attacking the government and does not mention possibilities for cooperation with other parties.

The speaker emphasizes cooperation with the support group that initiated the bill, demonstrating a readiness to work with colleagues who share similar interests. However, his attitude toward the opposing side and the government is extremely critical and uncompromising, especially regarding funding priorities and the location of the project.

The speaker refers to cooperation with other proponents of the no-confidence motion ("as our no-confidence initiators") and with colleagues (Martin Helme), demonstrating collaboration within the opposition faction during the submission of the motion. The style adopted towards the coalition parties (the Reform Party) is hostile, as the speaker refutes their arguments and accuses them of outright lying.