By Plenary Sessions: Helle-Moonika Helme

Insufficient data.

The main opponents are the Bank of Estonia, whose forecasts are considered failures and ideologically motivated, and Prime Minister Kaja Kallas. The criticism is intense, ranging from the political (climate policy) and professional (the Bank of Estonia's incompetence) levels to the moral level (the issue of abortion). No willingness to compromise is being expressed.

Strong opposition is aimed at the steering committee, which is accused of substantially disregarding the constitution by failing to consider proposals aimed at ensuring 100% reliability. Criticism is also directed at the government, which is considered potentially illegitimate, having gained power through e-votes, and at the Riigikogu board for labeling the obstruction illegal. The attacks are primarily procedural and focus on questions of constitutionality.

The main opponent is the government and the Minister of Culture, whose policies are accused of being detached from reality and undermining domestic security. The criticism is intense and substantive, specifically accusing the government of funding "Kremlin talking points" via Russian-language media and increasing the risk of ethnic conflicts through its immigration policy. The Minister is also criticized for avoiding answers to sensitive questions.

The opposition's stance is intense and aimed directly at a member of the government, criticizing the minister's inappropriate conduct, the substance of their responses, and their political choices. The criticism is both procedural (a matter of hierarchy) and personal (concerning the merit of the answers), with a complete lack of willingness to compromise, and the attacks are fierce.

The confrontation is intense and primarily directed at those who criticize the state's financial situation but refuse to back the austerity draft bill ("the crowd that whines every day"). Criticism is also leveled against proponents of earlier crisis measures (such as vaccination and restrictions on medical care), accusing them of hypocrisy. The attacks are both policy-based and personal, often referencing the prior stances of colleagues.

The primary opponent is the government and its policies, which are described as hostile to children and families, and disastrous. The criticism is sharp, focusing on political decisions (tax hikes, cuts to family benefits) and involvement in value-based issues (Hungary, LGBT). The government is accused of having an uncontrolled immigration policy and setting priorities that harm Estonian families. No willingness to compromise is expressed; instead, a change in government policy is demanded.

The main opponent is the Reform Party, which is accused of abusing power, politicizing the prosecutor's office, and implementing the "telephone law." The criticism is intense and ranges from political issues (the power vertical) to procedural and personal attacks (lying, ridicule). No willingness to compromise is evident; instead, the focus is on confrontation and the unethical behavior of opponents.

The main opponents are the Prime Minister and the government, who are criticized for the incompetent management of state assets, hypocrisy, and potential criminal activity. The criticism is political, procedural, and personal, pointing to the scandal involving the Prime Minister's family business and accusations that the government is spreading specific narratives. No possibility of compromise is offered.