By Plenary Sessions: Helle-Moonika Helme

The speaker is active during the plenary session, utilizing the options provided by parliamentary procedure on behalf of the faction ahead of the vote. The pattern of activity suggests a coordinated procedural intervention.

No data available

The speaker is highly active in the debate on the draft law, repeatedly posing questions to the rapporteur and the presiding officer, and defending his/her proposed amendments. He/She employs tactics of obstruction, calling for procedural recesses before votes and challenging the decisions of the Riigikogu Board concerning the admissibility of questions.

The member is highly active in procedural opposition, repeatedly calling for 10-minute recesses on a single session day before votes, which they justify by claiming it "has become standard practice." They actively participate in Question Time and utilize their full allocated time (including extensions) during plenary debates to deliver wide-ranging criticism of government policy.

The records show active engagement during the Riigikogu plenary session. Questions were directed to the minister, and participants engaged in intense procedural and substantive debates. The speaker is actively working to defend the legislature's position against the government.

The data indicates participation in the plenary session, where a critical speech was delivered, and on one occasion, answering a procedural question was refused. Data concerning broader patterns is unavailable.

The Member is active during the plenary session's Question Time, submitting repeated questions and follow-up remarks concerning the actions of various ministers. The speeches were concentrated on a single day, addressing multiple agenda items (foreign policy, family benefits, education reform). This pattern of activity indicates a focus on sharply criticizing government policy from the parliamentary rostrum.

The speaker is highly active during the plenary session, repeatedly posing questions to rapporteurs and co-rapporteurs and interjecting with points of order. This pattern of engagement demonstrates a strong commitment to the debate and to immediately correcting opponents' statements. All interventions originate from a single day of the session.

The speaker actively participates in the Riigikogu information hour, posing incisive questions to the Prime Minister. Patterns of activity indicate a response to media coverage (Postimees, Delfi) and issues raised in the press.