By Plenary Sessions: Helle-Moonika Helme

The criticism is directed toward the procedural side, expressing regret that the topic of geoengineering was not discussed at the committee meeting, a matter which the speaker deems important in the context of the draft legislation. There is no direct political opposition or personal criticism present.

No direct political opponent is named, but the criticism targets large companies that disregard the Language Act, as they are not motivated by the current small fine amounts. Economic policy is also indirectly criticized for causing cumulative inflation and tax hikes that reduce workers' incomes.

The main opponent is the prime minister and the government she leads, who are accused of undermining the economic environment and damaging the country's reputation by inciting war hysteria. The criticism is intense and encompasses both political decisions (tax hikes, lack of subsidies) and the sharp condemnation of her personal rhetoric, specifically accusing the prime minister of hypocrisy regarding family policy.

The main opponents are the government (the Reform Party, Kaja Kallas), the Climate Minister, and "the socialists and leftists," all of whom are accused of poor state management and economic decline. The criticism is intense, focusing on the government's inability to lead the country, the breaking of promises ("taxes will not rise"), and the humiliation of the populace. The government's policy is being referred to as "Tagurpidiantsla."

Not enough data

The primary conflict is with the government and its ministers, criticizing both their tax policy and the minister’s inability to provide clear answers and communicate their message to the public. Furthermore, the presiding officer of the session is being criticized for procedural impropriety, in defense of the chamber’s right to ask relevant questions.

The primary opponent is the government, and particularly the prime minister, who faces criticism regarding both policy matters (immigration, Rail Baltic, defense capability) and personal conduct (rushing through answers, displaying disrespect). The speaker connects the interests of businessmen affiliated with the Reform Party to the construction and profits of the nuclear power plant, suggesting corruption. The criticism is intense and uncompromising, casting doubt on the credibility of the prime minister’s promises.

The opposition is directed at the Riigikogu committee, which did not support the submitted bill for lowering the value-added tax, and the speaker expresses regret over this. Furthermore, he/she indirectly criticizes the extreme language used by the previous presenter, asking whether it meets the definition of "abuse."

The primary target is Prime Minister Kaja Kallas and her government, whose immediate resignation is being urgently demanded. The criticism is extensive, encompassing political issues (taxes, agriculture), ethical concerns (the East shipping scandal, lying), and security policy aspects. Furthermore, the government is accused of disregarding public opinion and the will of the people, as well as suppressing teachers.

The main opponents are the government and the ministries, who are criticized for wasteful spending and anti-education policies, along with the Lääneranna municipality. The criticism is intense and touches upon both specific political decisions (energy, education) and fundamental value issues (same-sex marriage, media content). The critics question the government's priorities, accusing them of squandering money and actively encouraging the decline of peripheral regions.