By Plenary Sessions: Helle-Moonika Helme

The collaboration style is directive yet personal, addressing the presenter by name and encouraging them, as an environmentalist, to delve deeply into specific topics. They demonstrate a desire to guide their colleagues' activities and research focus.

Regarding the language issue, the speaker referred to the cross-party consensus on the necessity of protecting the Estonian language and supporting the work of the Language Board. Concerning the income tax bills, he demonstrated a pragmatic approach, immediately presenting a new, slightly lower compromise proposal (42 cents) after the rejection of the initial proposal (45 cents) in order to achieve legislative success.

Data is scarce.

The speaker refers to their colleagues (Martin Helme, Rene Kokk, Kert Kingo) and their previously stated positions, demonstrating cooperation within the faction. There is no evidence of a willingness to compromise or engage in cross-party cooperation, as the focus remains on sharply opposing the government's policies.

The collaborative style is appreciative and supportive of the presenter, thanking them on multiple occasions. The reference to the Culture Committee's thorough work demonstrates a willingness to engage in in-depth cooperation with colleagues and discuss shared topics broadly.

The cooperative approach is aimed at colleagues in the chamber, who are protected from the presiding officer's criticism and whose support is sought for the bills that have been introduced. This refers to a shared understanding of economic concepts within the opposition, in contrast to the government's policy.

There is insufficient data. The speaker addresses colleagues and EKRE MPs, but there are no references to cooperation with other political parties, a willingness to compromise, or bilateral efforts.

The speaker values the plurality of opinions and the substantive debate, thanking the previous presenters (including Martin Helme) for their balanced presentation. They show respect for differing views but express disappointment over the lack of cooperation at the committee level, which resulted in the draft bill being left unsupported.

There is not enough data.

Not enough data.