By Plenary Sessions: Andre Hanimägi

The primary criticism is aimed at the Interior Minister's decision to shut down the license plate recognition cameras, which is viewed as a severe blow and a mistake for Estonia's security. Ideologically, they oppose those who view the national anti-fraud action plan as excessive interference or the promotion of a "nanny state." Regarding religious matters, the opposition is directed against the Moscow Patriarchate, viewing it as an institution that justifies the ideology of violence.

The criticism is directed against the government's actions and process management (specifically the prison lease issue), particularly regarding the inadequate public consultation and the ignoring of concerns raised by security institutions. The opposition is procedural and policy-based, demanding improved procedures and the resolution of concerns before the agreements are signed.

A strong opposition is directed at the Reform Party-led government due to its unequal tax policy and the severe skewing of regional policy. Furthermore, the Centre Party (Lauri Laats) is sharply criticized for hypocrisy regarding kindergarten placement fees, with critics highlighting their previous failures and omissions while they were in power. The criticism is both political and historical-procedural, accusing opponents of incompetence and exacerbating inequality.

The main opponent is the Reform Party (often dubbed the "Prime Minister's party") and the Prime Minister personally, who is accused of allowing regional policy to die out. The criticism is intense and centers on political unfairness, particularly the preferential treatment given to Tallinn in social and tax policy.

Strong opposition is aimed at the government and the ruling coalition, who are being criticized for halting the system and failing to provide solutions. Criticism is particularly sharp regarding the Interior Minister's premature decision and the coalition's internal dysfunction (specifically, the Ministry of Justice's opposition to the Ministry of the Interior's draft bill). The criticism is primarily procedural and political, highlighting the immense waste of time.

The main confrontation is with the government and the Reform Party, who are being criticized for failing to support the bill and for the political discord between the Tallinn and national levels. The criticism focuses on policy and procedure, accusing opponents of inaction and unreasonable rigidity in refusing to grant the necessary powers to Mupo (the Municipal Police). The speaker faults the government for failing to offer alternative solutions or address the problem.

The opposition is aimed at policies that rely on market forces and systemic government failures that have deepened the crisis. Specific criticism targets the current government's decision to raise VAT, which adds thousands of euros to housing prices. The state's ongoing practice of selling land for quick profit is also being criticized.

The primary criticism is aimed at the government and the Minister of Social Affairs, who are accused of failing to make decisions and dragging out projects. The criticism is procedural and political, stressing that even after the removal of the coalition's "known brake," no progress has been made. The speaker considers further deliberation and analysis to be mere delaying tactics.