By Plenary Sessions: Andre Hanimägi

The speaker has actively participated in the committee work on the draft legislation, referencing the compromises achieved there and emphasizing the police's obligation to provide an annual overview. He/She is familiar with the daily operations of the PPA (Police and Border Guard Board) and the incidents where the lack of a license plate recognition system caused problems during the summer.

The speaker is an active proponent of interpellations, focusing on the government’s recent decisions and the advancement of legislation (the second reading of the draft bill). He references previous debates held in the Legal Affairs Committee and analyzes the chronology of events (the spring stoppage, the summer period of inactivity), thereby demonstrating continuous legislative oversight.

Serves as the representative of the lead committee (the Legal Affairs Committee), reporting on the September 8 session and its procedural decisions. Is an active driver of the legislative process, presenting the committee's position at the plenary session.

The data is limited to a single question asked during the plenary session, which was directed to the Chancellor of Justice regarding issues of privacy and the Children's Ombudsman. Insufficient data.

Insufficient data

The speaker refers to the Social Democrats' previous repeated references concerning the issues within the non-bank credit market. Furthermore, the intention to expedite the processing of the financial ombudsman bill is highlighted, which demonstrates continuous activity in championing this subject. The pattern of action involves acknowledging institutions (FI) and criticizing political inaction.

The speaker is active during the plenary session of the Riigikogu, presenting as the representative (rapporteur) of the leading committee (the Legal Affairs Committee) during the debate on the draft bill. Their pattern of activity involves providing a detailed account of the committee's work and questioning government representatives regarding the absence of an impact assessment.

There is not enough data.

The speaker is active during the Riigikogu plenary session, submitting both follow-up questions stemming from an earlier interpellation and new, detailed questions across several sectors (social affairs, taxation, energy, and labor). They reference the interpellation submitted in the spring and demand specific answers from the ministers regarding future action plans (e.g., the autumn roundtable discussion). These patterns of activity suggest continuous monitoring of the legislative process.

The speaker is highly active in the Riigikogu chamber, focusing on initiating draft legislation (on behalf of the Legal Affairs Committee) and, notably, submitting interpellations to ministers (Igor Taro, Karmen Joller). This activity is reactive, utilizing current events (Supreme Court decisions, international treaties, media commentary) to trigger parliamentary mechanisms.