By Plenary Sessions: Kalle Grünthal

The speaker is vehemently opposed to the introduction of new taxes—the "tax axe." Criticism is leveled against the state's practice of handing out money abroad (101 million via ESTDEV), with demands for fiscal discipline and for funds to be channeled toward the benefit of the Estonian people. The government's justifications concerning procedural costs are also being questioned, with the assertion that they are inaccurate.

Economic perspectives are sharply critical of the government's actions, which have resulted in the destruction of the economy and widespread business bankruptcies. Climate policy is viewed primarily as financial manipulation and a business scheme (CO2 quotas, the sale of wind turbines) designed to serve the interests of a select few. The protection of Estonia's economic interests at the European level is demanded.

Economic views are presented indirectly, emphasizing that the car tax and sugar tax are trivial matters—a mere trifle ("köki-möki")—compared to the correct selection of the individuals governing the country. The focus is rather on the quality of governance than on direct economic policy.

Insufficient information

Not enough data.

There is not enough data.

There is insufficient data.

Insufficient dataset

No data available

The economic views indirectly touch upon tax policy, as the speaker supports the proposal to scrap the introduction of the motor vehicle tax. Specific stances on taxation, spending, or economic growth are not directly evident in the speeches.

Economic views are strongly opposed to tax hikes, criticizing the 'tax avalanche' (excise, income tax, VAT, car, sugar) which puts families with many children in a difficult position. The speaker opposes the government's spending priorities, particularly the allocation of funds to bring in talent from third countries at the expense of domestic services.