By Plenary Sessions: Kalle Grünthal

All speeches originate from a single session day (April 30, 2024), demonstrating active participation in the plenary discussions. The speaker intervenes in both substantive debates (tax policy, foreign aid) and procedural matters (the session schedule, voting procedures).

The data is restricted to three interventions that occurred during a single day of a plenary session, where questions were posed to both the Governor of the Bank of Estonia and the Prime Minister. Data regarding the frequency or pattern outside of this specific session is missing.

The speaker is highly active during the plenary session, repeatedly posing questions and delivering a lengthy address concerning the election law. This pattern involves the consistent highlighting of procedural violations and the referencing of prior legal actions (specifically, appealing to the Supreme Court with election complaints). The actions are focused on exercising oversight and demanding accountability from the Riigikogu Board.

The speaker actively utilizes the Riigikogu information hour to demand answers from ministers and criticize the government's activities. Participation in collective action is also mentioned, such as 11 Members of Parliament sending a joint letter to the WHO and engaging in correspondence with the President. This demonstrates active involvement both in parliamentary oversight mechanisms and in joint opposition initiatives.

The data is limited to the submission of a single question to a minister during a plenary session, which demonstrates activity in holding the government accountable for social issues.

The data indicates active participation in the plenary session, where the speaker raised two questions regarding the same procedural matter within a short period of time.

There is insufficient data.

The pattern of activity indicates active participation in the plenary session, where three questions were posed in quick succession, all relating to the same procedural topic. This suggests a focus on the specific agenda items of that particular session.

The speaker is active during the plenary session, repeatedly raising questions and points of order within a short timeframe, which indicates continuous oversight of adherence to the law and procedural rules. This pattern of activity focuses on direct intervention in parliamentary proceedings.

The pattern indicates active participation in plenary sessions, especially concerning procedural disputes and the debate of draft legislation. The speaker intervened in the discussion, which had started the previous day, demonstrating a readiness to immediately respond to procedural issues.

The pattern of activity demonstrates active participation in plenary sessions, repeatedly posing questions to both the Prime Minister and various ministers, and engaging in substantial debate following the response to interpellations. The speaker is actively involved in the critical scrutiny of government activities.