By Plenary Sessions: Kalle Grünthal

The speaker is an active initiator of draft legislation and participates intensely in plenary debates, defending their proposals and fielding questions. They describe active communication with interest groups (a Facebook group, Urmas Sepp) and official authorities (the Environmental Board, 112, 1313). They also reference personal research, such as filming airplanes in Paide.

Insufficient data

The speaker is active during the Riigikogu's Question Time, asking repeated questions and employing procedural means to ensure that the Prime Minister answers the substantive question posed.

The speaker’s pattern of activity centers on a legislative initiative in the Riigikogu plenary session, involving the presentation of a draft bill and answering questions. They refer to prior work that included conducting interviews and receiving correspondence from individuals who suffered vaccine injuries. They also mention a similar draft bill that lapsed from procedure during the previous Riigikogu session.

All the speeches were held on a single day (January 22, 2024) and focus on inquiries concerning the renovation obligation and the car tax. The pattern demonstrates the linking of political topics (renovation, car tax) into a broader narrative about the elimination of private property.

The speaker actively participated in the plenary session, repeatedly posing questions and delivering a lengthy report concerning the draft bill on amending the Income Tax Act. He demonstrated a desire for substantive discussion, criticizing the departure and inattentiveness of his colleagues. All these appearances took place during a single session day.

The pattern of activity involves active participation in the plenary session through the posing of questions, including requests for clarifications and follow-up questions directed to the rapporteur. The speaker actively engages in the discussion of legal topics, demanding explanations concerning the institutions' inaction.

This pattern of activity is directed towards directly questioning and criticizing the government during plenary sessions, submitting both oral questions and formal interpellations. It demands written answers from members of the government, which must be verifiable through commercial register entries, in order to substantiate claims of their alleged dishonesty.

The speaker is active in the plenary session, participating in several debates concerning the processing of draft legislation and adherence to the rules governing the Riigikogu agenda. He/She communicates directly with colleagues (Varro Vooglaid, Karmen Joller, Liisa Pakosta) as well as with the legal advisor to the Riigikogu Legal Affairs Committee. The pattern of activity indicates a focus on the procedural correctness of the sessions.

The speaker was active during the plenary session, posing questions regarding both substantive bills (VAT) and the procedural organization of the session. All interventions occurred within a single day, which suggests focused participation in the ongoing debate and the raising of procedural issues.

The speaker closely monitored the Prime Minister's public appearance (referencing "Esimene stuudio") and used it as the basis for questions during the information session, demonstrating active media monitoring.

Insufficient data.