By Months: Kalle Grünthal

The style of cooperation is primarily confrontational and focuses on opposition activities. There are no indications of cooperation with the ruling coalition. Support for Mart Helme's position on procedural issues is noted, and reference is made to the unified stance of the EKRE faction members, which demonstrates internal factional unity.

There is not enough data.

The style of collaboration is primarily confrontational and critical. He/She recognizes only the President's legal advisors and Varro Vooglaid as constitutional experts. There are no indications of seeking compromises or cross-party cooperation; rather, he/she issues public challenges and demands accountability.

The speaker primarily operates as an opponent, attempting to halt or postpone the coalition’s draft legislation (e.g., the procedural handling of the Employment Contracts Act). He references the seriousness of the proposals put forth by other opposition members (Lauri Läänemets, Raimond Kaljulaid) and supports certain conceptual developments (Jaak Valge), though direct, broad-based cooperation is not detailed. He demands that the Riigikogu Board convene representatives of the parliamentary groups to de-escalate tensions.

The speaker’s style is overwhelmingly confrontational and uncompromising toward the government. He/She references cooperation and communication outside the Riigikogu (Parliament), citing examples like Forus taxi drivers and a delegation of children, and commends fellow opposition member Rain Epler for his sharp wit in exposing the government. The speaker views international complaint mechanisms (such as the UN) as a tool through which women and children can halt the coalition’s "steamroller," given that there is no opportunity to do so within the Riigikogu itself.

The style of cooperation is predominantly confrontational, demanding accountability and swift action from the government, rather than compromises. Cooperation is mentioned with a group of Estonian scientists working to solve the demographic problem, and with reservists whose letters prompted the initiation of the draft legislation. He criticizes the committee members for legal imprecision.

Insufficient data

The speaker's style is predominantly confrontational and uncompromising. He calls on coalition members to support his bills, but does so with an accusatory tone. The only clear support is expressed in backing the Chancellor of Justice’s proposals, which limit the power of officials and improve the quality of legislation.