By Plenary Sessions: Kalle Grünthal
Total Sessions: 9
Fully Profiled: 9
2025-03-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Insufficient data.
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
Insufficient data.
2025-03-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Data regarding the cooperation style is unavailable, as the speaker is currently engaged in a direct and sharp confrontation with the bill's proponent, demanding answers and criticizing the draft's deficiencies.
2025-03-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.
Refers to a clear question posed by a colleague (Helle-Moonika Helme) regarding the importance of national defense and nuclear technology, using it to support their own position. This demonstrates internal consistency and shared views within the party or faction.
2025-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The style of cooperation is pragmatic, acknowledging the serious approach of the National Defence Committee to the issue, but rejecting the proposals to withdraw or postpone the draft legislation. He proposes sending the bill for a second reading in order to refine the legal wording and reach an acceptable resolution.
2025-03-18
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth sitting, plenary session
The speaker is antagonistic towards the government, but shows cooperation with colleagues by joining Mart Helme’s question concerning the minister’s absence. He relies on external expertise, referencing a group of scientists who have made proposals for increasing the birth rate.
2025-03-17
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker collaborates with scientists, using the facts and proposals they present as the basis for policy. The role of the Social Affairs Committee in addressing the issue is also emphasized, but it is acknowledged that the final decision-making authority rests with the government.
2025-03-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
Not enough data.
2025-03-12
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
The referencing of Valdo Randpere’s arguments hints at cooperation, indicating the existence of a shared concern regarding procedural issues. There is no information about broader cross-party cooperation or a readiness to compromise concerning the criticized committees.