By Plenary Sessions: Kalle Grünthal

There is not enough data.

The confrontation is directed at government ministers (three mentioned) whose integrity is being called into question. The criticism is procedural and ethical, emphasizing that the immunity afforded to Riigikogu members does not extend to ministers, and thus they must be held accountable for potential false statements.

The main criticism is aimed at the proponent of the draft bill and the content of the bill itself, which is considered a threat to Estonian sovereignty because it obligates Estonia to comply with Council decisions. The criticism is intense and includes accusations that the bill restores the Soviet Union-era decision-making model, thereby ruling out any compromise regarding the question of independence.

The position opposes the government's policy, criticizing the funding of wind energy at the expense of national defense under the pretext of lacking financial resources. The critique targets the improper allocation of resources and the favoring of foreign companies over national security.

The main opponents are the Reform Party and Defense Minister Hanno Pevkur, who are sharply criticized for neglecting reservists and for the work left undone over the past eight years. The criticism is aimed at political negligence and the incorrect setting of priorities, while also accusing the Ministry of Finance of providing an "arrogant" response. The speaker considers the government's actions to be "vile and brazen behavior."

The opposition is targeting the government and its representatives, criticizing them both for their policies (specifically, migration that is destroying Estonia) and for procedural violations (such as ignoring the rules of legislative drafting). The attacks are intense and include personal accusations (e.g., the rapporteur being tight-lipped and the minister exceeding their authority). The speaker urges the audience not to support the draft bill, ruling out any possibility of compromise.

Insufficient data.

The main opponents are Irja Lutsar and Tanel Kiik, who represent the government and the medical mainstream, and from whom answers regarding vaccine safety are demanded. The criticism is intense and ranges from political failure to accusations of involvement in a human depopulation project.

The primary criticism is aimed at the Constitutional Committee, which is being accused of engaging in political games and neglecting its role as the upholder of constitutional values. Government members are also facing criticism for failing to fulfill their obligation to report to the Riigikogu and respond to members' demands. The criticism is intense and focuses on procedural and institutional violations.