By Plenary Sessions: Mart Võrklaev

Insufficient data.

The main criticism is directed at politicians from previous years who created the budget deficit through irresponsible spending and promises, without ever asking where the money would come from. The speaker firmly rejects the question of Putin's direct role in implementing the motor vehicle tax, although they do link Putin's actions to the necessity of increasing defense spending.

The main criticism is directed at EKRE and Siim Pohlak as the bill's initiators, criticizing the quality of the material they presented, the scarcity of content, and the brevity of the accompanying explanation. The criticism targets both procedural and substantive deficiencies, suggesting the bill was introduced for populist aims.

The main opponents are the Social Democrats (Sotsid) and specifically Jevgeni Ossinovski, who is being accused of consistently demanding a higher car tax. The criticism is politically sharp, accusing the opposition of leveling false accusations and having an excessive desire to collect taxes from their own people. He emphasizes that he stood against the Social Democrats' tax demands.