By Plenary Sessions: Varro Vooglaid

The speaker expressed concern regarding the lack of comprehensive availability of wind energy planning data, referring to this as a critical bottleneck. They are capable of posing technical questions concerning the intermittency of renewable energy and regional security of supply, for example, citing the synchronicity of the absence of sun and wind across neighboring countries. At the same time, they themselves emphasized that they are not a specialist in the field, positioning themselves instead in the role of an informed interested party.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in international law and diplomatic relations (the Vienna Convention), highlighting the principle of non-interference. He is well-versed in the details of the events in Georgia, citing specific figures for sanctions (11 and 14 individuals) and the statements issued by the Georgian government directed at Estonia and Lithuania. He demands that proof be provided for the allegations concerning the undemocratic nature of the Georgian elections.

The speaker demonstrates profound expertise in the fields of legislation, constitutional law, and litigation, employing specific terminology such as "constitutional review" and "good legislative practice." He substantiates his points with data (e.g., 70% of draft legislation lacking analysis) and references Article 3, Paragraph 1 of the Constitution. Furthermore, he exhibits a philosophical grounding, connecting the proliferation of laws with the ethical state of society (the Platonic conception).

The speaker demonstrates knowledge in the field of wind energy planning (detailed spatial plans, lack of information from local municipalities) and civil radio interference, citing specific measurements (16 km, 100 times the allowed limit) and the concerns of the Defence Forces. He is also familiar with the processing of Riigikogu decisions and the delegation of constitutional powers concerning military missions, referencing Decision 479. He uses technical terminology, although he admits that he is neither a physicist nor a mathematician.

The speaker demonstrates knowledge in the field of administrative law and legislation, focusing on the precise interpretation of the concept and purpose of the state fee. Technical terms are used, such as "state fee rates," "costs of procedures," and "conceptual error," emphasizing that the levy must cover expenditures, not function as a fine.

The speaker demonstrates a strong understanding of mineral resource management mechanisms, contrasting the concession model with the establishment of a state-owned joint-stock company. Technical terminology, such as "concession mechanism," is employed, and reference is made to the case of Eesti Energia, thereby showcasing expertise in public sector economic models.

The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding the points of convergence between international law and domestic legislation, particularly in relation to the Convention on the Rights of the Child. They cite and analyze specific Convention articles (e.g., Art 12, paragraph 1; Art 24; Art 36) to illustrate the danger of their overly expansive interpretation. The core of the expertise centers on the legal consequences arising from the conflict between international committee decisions and current Estonian law.

The speaker demonstrates strong expertise in international and Estonian constitutional law, referencing specific provisions (Section 128 of the Constitution, the Riigikogu Rules of Procedure Act) and principles of international law (state consent for the operation of armed forces). Furthermore, he exhibits knowledge of the defense forces' capabilities and equipment (the absence of tanks, fighter jets, and air defense systems).

The speaker demonstrates knowledge of the principles of legislation, stressing the necessity of simple and unambiguous wording and criticizing the complexity inherent in the interplay of legal norms. He discusses the points of intersection between child protection and criminal law, mentioning the entry into force of a court judgment and the potential role of the Social Insurance Board in reviewing prohibitions. Furthermore, he refers to the constitutional right to life in the context of unborn children.