By Plenary Sessions: Varro Vooglaid

The speaker mentioned a recent meeting within the faction with people who have been dealing with the wind energy issue. This points to active work being done inside the faction and communication with all interested parties. It shows that the topic undergoes thorough preparation and consultation before any questions are formally put forward.

The course of action involves posing specific questions during the Riigikogu information session, followed by a strong protest directed at the session chair when the respondent (the Foreign Minister) refuses to provide substantive answers to the questions. He/She references the Foreign Minister's previous actions (the June visit to Tbilisi) and recent media developments (comments made by the Georgian government).

The speeches were presented during the plenary session as an analysis of the questions and report directed to the Minister of Justice, indicating active participation in the parliament's oversight function. The speaker conducts a thorough analysis of the documents submitted by the government. Data concerning other activity patterns is unavailable.

The speaker recently met with representatives of the NGO For Nature and People, demonstrating active engagement with civil society on the topic of wind turbines. They have actively participated in the discussions regarding the Riigikogu draft resolution, raising the issue during both the first and second readings.

The speaker is actively participating in the plenary session, raising successive questions and requests for clarification regarding the same draft bill, which points to focused engagement in the legislative debate.

The data presented covers only one plenary session speech, making it impossible to draw conclusions about regularity or rhythm.

There is insufficient data regarding the frequency of occurrence or other activity patterns, since only two speeches from the same plenary session have been provided.

Records indicate active participation in the plenary session on December 4th, repeatedly posing questions and making interventions during the second reading of the bills concerning defense force mandates and tax increases. The speaker utilizes procedural mechanisms (reply speeches, procedural questions) to reiterate their positions and respond to criticism from colleagues.

The speaker is an active legislator, referencing a bill he recently introduced concerning the protection of the lives of unborn children, which was rejected in the first reading. This demonstrates consistent initiative in introducing value-based legislation.