By Plenary Sessions: Varro Vooglaid

The speaker sharply criticizes the cooperation among coalition partners, calling it a "propaganda show" organized in support of the Minister of the Interior. There is no evidence indicating openness to compromises or collaboration with other political parties.

No data available

The speaker expresses agreement with their conversation partner regarding the necessity of implementing a bank tax, which signals a willingness to cooperate toward a shared objective. However, they also raise clarifying and critical questions concerning the details of the tax structure to ensure the solution is effective.

The speaker supportively references and agrees with the positions of colleagues Rene Kokk and Tõnis Lukas concerning the necessity of prisons and the commemoration of the 1944 fighters. This demonstrates cooperation with colleagues who share similar views, but information regarding a cross-party compromise is lacking.

The cooperation is manifested in sharing common concerns with other opposition members of parliament (e.g., Rain Epler, Rene Kokk), whose questions he references. He also uses the positions of the Chancellor of Justice and the Auditor General to support his arguments. There is no information regarding the search for a compromise with the ruling coalition or cross-party cooperation.

According to the available data, there is no information regarding any willingness to cooperate or compromise; the speaker’s position is purely confrontational and highly critical of the government’s proposed bill.

The speaker is actively seeking cross-party cooperation, noting the common concern prevailing in the chamber. He/She proposes procedural solutions (a recess, returning the bill to the committee) in order to establish a unified position on the draft bill that would not violate the conscience of anyone, neither in the opposition nor the coalition.

The collaborative style is evident in the way colleagues' topics are continued, citing Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart in the context of the Nordica issue. There is no information available regarding openness to compromise or broad-based, cross-party cooperation.

Insufficient data.