By Plenary Sessions: Varro Vooglaid
Total Sessions: 149
Fully Profiled: 149
2025-10-15
The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
Insufficient data.
2025-10-15
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour
The speaker demonstrates cooperation with his faction colleague (Martin Helme), defending his right to raise critical questions regardless of his personal presence. There is no evidence of cross-party cooperation or the seeking of compromises.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The speaker represents the position of their parliamentary group and urges all other Members of Parliament to vote against the proposed bill. They are clearly uncompromising regarding this specific piece of legislation, stating that no compromise has been reached with the PPA and the Ministry of the Interior.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour
Evidence of a cooperative style is lacking; the speaker maintains a purely oppositional and confrontational stance toward the government.
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The speaker emphasizes proper decorum and defends a colleague (Peeter Raudsepp) against personal attacks, indicating a desire to maintain the dignity of the debate. There is no information regarding cooperation or willingness to compromise with the governing coalition.
2025-09-24
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The speaker represents the views of their parliamentary group and is prepared to defend their positions (for example, in the National Defense Committee). However, they express skepticism regarding the utility of such a debate, given that previous arguments have failed to have an impact. Their approach is rather confrontational and focuses on defending constitutional integrity, rather than seeking compromises.
2025-09-24
15th Estonian Parliament, 6th sitting, press briefing
Lack of data
2025-09-23
15th Riigikogu, 6th session, plenary session
The speaker is open to collaboration, calling for a joint discussion aimed at improving the draft bill and identifying potential amendments. The objective is to collectively discuss what those potential changes might entail.
2025-09-22
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
Little information is available regarding the style of cooperation, but the speaker addresses "dear colleagues" and "the Estonian public," urging them to assess the adequacy and veracity of the prime minister's claims. There are no indications of a willingness to compromise with the government or engage in cross-party cooperation.
2025-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.
Primarily clashing with the heads of the committees, demanding that they acknowledge responsibility and engage in introspection. It refers to cooperation and shared concern with other members of parliament (Urmas Reinsalu, Anastassia, Rain), who also warned against unconstitutionality. It expresses the desire to continue a private discussion on legal issues with the President's legal advisor.
2025-09-17
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, press briefing.
The style of interaction in this context is confrontational, demanding specific answers from the opposing side and rejecting generalizations. There is no data regarding cooperation or a willingness to compromise with other political forces. The speaker focuses on demanding accountability and obtaining information.
2025-09-16
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The collaborative approach is open to inter-institutional dialogue, actively seeking proposals and solutions from the Chancellor of Justice aimed at raising the competence of the Riigikogu. This indicates a readiness to cooperate with experts in order to resolve institutional problems.
2025-09-15
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting
The speaker refers to colleague Martin Helme's previous question, which demonstrates a certain level of cooperation or unity of views with the faction or colleagues holding similar views when addressing the present topic.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
Cooperation has been mentioned only in a procedural context, specifically regarding a message from a colleague ("Rain") about withdrawing the question. There is no information about inter-party cooperation or willingness to compromise on substantive issues, as the focus is on strong opposition.
2025-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session.
The speaker points to similar questions and concerns raised by colleagues (Rene Kokk, Reinsalu), suggesting collaboration within the faction or among colleagues who share the same stance. There is no evidence of attempts to seek compromises with the governing coalition partners.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The speaker cooperates with opposition factions, having submitted draft legislation on behalf of members of the EKRE and Center Party parliamentary groups, for example, concerning the appeal to the Venice Commission. This cooperation is aimed at achieving common goals in the interest of the opposition, but there is absolutely no sign of any readiness to compromise with the coalition. The style is rather confrontational and legally demanding.
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
No data available
2025-06-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker referenced colleague Rain Epler’s statement positively and agreed with his position that the situation might be similar to the case involving the PPA (Police and Border Guard Board) cameras. This demonstrates a willingness to cooperate and share viewpoints with colleagues who hold similar values. However, information regarding broader, cross-party cooperation is unavailable.
2025-06-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Insufficient data.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The cooperative style is selective; he supports the Center Party faction's amendment, which he believes would eliminate the unconstitutionality. Generally, communication with the coalition is confrontational and uncompromising, accusing them of deliberately ignoring the president's positions.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing.
Not enough data
2025-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
The speaker proposes cooperation between the Supreme Court and the University of Tartu Faculty of Law to offer members of parliament professional development opportunities regarding ensuring constitutional compliance. He is open to inter-institutional support in solving systemic problems.
2025-06-09
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Not enough data.
2025-05-21
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
Information is scarce. The speaker is primarily engaged in sharp criticism of the government's policy and makes no reference to cooperation or willingness to compromise with other political forces.
2025-05-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing.
The reference is made to a colleague and a benchmate, suggesting internal cooperation within their own parliamentary group, specifically by supporting the issue raised by the colleague. There is no indication of seeking compromise with the government or other political parties; the focus remains squarely on holding the government accountable.
2025-05-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Information regarding willingness to cooperate is unavailable; the speaker focuses on attacking the opposing side and addressing the chair of the session with procedural questions. Willingness to compromise is not evident, as they demand the complete cessation of government activity and the request for a new mandate.
2025-05-19
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
Insufficient data.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
There is insufficient information. The speaker mentions the Centre Party's proposal for amending the law as an acceptable alternative, which points to a willingness to support solutions put forward by other parties, provided they respect the constitution and offer adequate instruments for ensuring security.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.
Not enough data
2025-05-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
Regarding cooperation, the need to involve the opposition in representative bodies is emphasized, proposing that of the Riigikogu members belonging to KHAN, one should be from the opposition and the other from the coalition. Closer cooperation with the judicial system is also demanded, requesting the Minister of Justice to seek an official assessment of the bill from the Supreme Court and other courts.
2025-05-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
Regarding cooperation, there is no direct information available concerning domestic inter-party collaboration, but he/she welcomes the new Minister of the Interior's different stance on the firearms issue (assuming the rumors are true). He/She actively recommends studying and replicating the Finnish system, which is favorable to shooting culture, in order to avoid "reinventing the wheel."
2025-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Although critical, it proposes concrete four-tiered solutions that require cooperation among ministries, the Minister of Justice, parliamentary committees, and the Riigikogu Board. It also proposes offering supplementary training to all Riigikogu members to improve their ability to assess the constitutionality of draft legislation.
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker questions whether the current engagement process involves genuine cooperation, often dismissing it as mere "tokenism." They propose a solution: the country should establish an institution capable of providing evidence-based analyses and modeling at the request of various political groups, highlighting the need for improved analytical collaboration.
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
There is not enough data.
2025-05-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker recommends cooperation with the Riigikogu Board and the heads of the committees to establish a standard under which draft legislation lacking constitutional analysis would be returned to the government. This indicates a desire to improve the parliament's internal procedural standards, but there is no information regarding cross-party political cooperation.
2025-04-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker relies heavily on the informative presentations given by experts and previous speakers, using them as the foundation for their arguments. Efforts are being made to find common ground with the coalition parties regarding support for the Danish farm subsidy project, but overall, the communication remains confrontational.
2025-04-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker referred approvingly to Lauri Laats’ presentation and questions, which demonstrates cooperation among like-minded colleagues. The main objective of this collaboration is to secure sufficient support in parliament for the establishment of an investigative committee tasked with assessing the security of e-voting.
2025-04-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker begins their address by agreeing with the previous speaker’s standpoints, which indicates openness and a readiness to acknowledge the arguments of others. The focus of cooperation is directed toward engaging the public and granting them the right to make decisions.
2025-04-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The address is framed as a question, suggesting an openness to debate and seeking others' opinions, yet the proposed solution (a referendum coupled with regional veto power) is highly specific and a matter of principle.
2025-04-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The current pattern of collaboration is rather confrontational, primarily aimed at criticizing the government's actions. Simultaneously, there is a reference to a former ally (colleague Rene Kokk), who raised similar concerns during the handling of the draft legislation, thereby demonstrating substantive alignment with certain opposition forces.
2025-04-09
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker is addressing colleagues on behalf of the faction, but there is no evidence of a willingness to cooperate or seek compromises with other parties. Instead, the disappointment is expressed in the fact that the opposition's arguments are not being heard.
2025-04-09
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
Insufficient data.
2025-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Data is scarce. All the arguments presented are aimed at intensively questioning the opposing side and challenging their claims, rather than cooperation.
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
There is no direct information regarding cooperation, but the speaker supports their arguments with references from outside the Riigikogu (Parliament), for example, by citing Andres Põder, the former archbishop of the Estonian Evangelical Lutheran Church. They criticize the passivity of the Estonian Council of Churches (EKN) in stepping forward to defend the MPEÕK. No willingness to cooperate with the bill's supporters is evident.
2025-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker demonstrates readiness for compromise by proposing concrete amendments (changing coefficients or linking it to the CPI) aimed at improving the draft bill and preventing its rejection during the first reading. He urges his coalition colleagues to vote in favor of the bill, which is substantively sound.
2025-03-18
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth sitting, plenary session
There are no references to cooperation with the coalition; instead, emphasis is placed on intra-factional cooperation (such as submitting a counter-bill) and shared political objectives (organizing a referendum on the marriage issue while in government). The style of communication with the coalition is confrontational and uncompromising.
2025-03-17
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
There is insufficient data.
2025-03-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The style of cooperation is primarily oppositional, but it relies on an international group of experts (the NORTH Group) and other critical voices (Kaari Saarma). The speaker stresses the necessity of involving independent experts in the work of the investigative committee to ensure transparency and prevent conflicts of interest. He/She expresses disappointment regarding Parliament’s inability to cooperate on substantive issues, noting that the opposition’s draft bills are "immediately killed off."
2025-03-12
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
The speaker stresses the necessity of universal rules to ensure consistency in cooperation between the parliament and the government, signaling a desire for fair and principled collaboration. Nevertheless, the context of the address remains confrontational, given that the opposing side's willingness to apply these rules uniformly is being called into doubt. Direct cooperation or compromise is not mentioned.
2025-03-12
The 15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.
Not enough data.
2025-02-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
There is not enough data.
2025-02-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Insufficient data
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary sitting
There is no information regarding attempts to seek cooperation, compromise, or coalitions with the bill’s supporters; the speaker’s position is categorically opposed to the proposed legislation. Instead of cooperation, a motion for rejection was submitted electronically.
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th sitting, information briefing
The speeches contain no references to cooperation with domestic colleagues or bipartisan activity. The focus of cooperation is aimed at bringing Estonian policy into alignment with the values of the new U.S. administration.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker clearly operates within the opposition framework, citing other opposition members of parliament and media commentators who share similar views regarding the government. There is no evidence of any attempt to seek cooperation or compromise with the governing coalition.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
Insufficient data.
2025-02-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The data is insufficient.
2025-01-29
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th sitting, information briefing
The presenter stresses the necessity of broad support and advocates for collaboration with independent field experts and business owners. They support establishing a working group composed of independent specialists to draft a new development plan, highlighting a preference for expert involvement and wide consensus.
2025-01-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
There is little information available. The tone of the discourse is purely confrontational and antagonistic, lacking any indications of cooperation or willingness to compromise.
2025-01-22
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.
The speaker represents the position of the Estonian Conservative People's Party faction, which is completely opposed to the draft legislation, and no opportunities for cooperation or compromise are being offered to the bill's supporters.
2025-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
No data available
2025-01-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
No data available
2025-01-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The collaborative style is evident in the continuation of the question posed by colleague Rain Epler, which suggests the coordination of common concerns or political positions with other members of the Riigikogu. This demonstrates a willingness to build upon topics initiated by others.
2024-12-18
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
No data available
2024-12-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing
Data regarding the style of cooperation is missing; only confrontational and accusatory communication with the government representative and the session chair is present. There are no indications of cooperation with other Riigikogu members or readiness to compromise.
2024-12-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
No data available.
2024-12-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth session, press briefing.
The speaker demonstrates cooperation with civil society by meeting with representatives of the NGO 'For Nature and People,' who have thoroughly investigated the issues surrounding wind turbines. He also refers to an article previously cited by his colleague (Arvo Aller), which illustrates internal communication within the faction.
2024-12-10
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Not enough data
2024-12-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
There is not enough data.
2024-12-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session.
There is no information regarding willingness for cooperation or compromise, as the speaker is focused entirely on sharply criticizing the government and highlighting legal threats.
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
Not enough data
2024-12-03
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
There is no information available regarding any willingness to cooperate or compromise. The speaker presents their position as an absolute and unconditional principle, asserting that discussions should be entirely unnecessary if the objective were truly taken seriously.
2024-11-21
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
Insufficient data
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The cooperation style is pragmatic and conditional: the speaker agrees with the fundamental positions (e.g., the need for analyses by law enforcement agencies), but sets strict conditions for further proceedings. Private information regarding the analyses is requested for review, demonstrating a readiness for data collection.
2024-11-20
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing.
Insufficient data.
2024-11-18
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth Session, Plenary Session
Not enough data
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.
The speaker expresses complete agreement with colleague Martin Helme's assessment regarding the futility of the opposition, citing internal support within the opposition bloc. There is no information indicating any openness to compromise or cooperation with the governing coalition.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
Insufficient data
2024-11-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker is open to discussion and urges coalition MPs to submit critical questions and propose amendments to improve the draft bill so that it might at least reach the second reading. At the same time, he/she emphasizes that compromise is not possible on the fundamental issue concerning the state funding of the killing of an innocent person.
2024-11-06
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speaker refers to the shared conviction of his faction, but there is no information regarding cooperation with other factions or the government. His style is rather confrontational, demanding answers from the minister and criticizing his refusal to respond.
2024-11-05
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
There is not enough data.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The speaker sharply criticizes the cooperation among coalition partners, calling it a "propaganda show" organized in support of the Minister of the Interior. There is no evidence indicating openness to compromises or collaboration with other political parties.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
No data available
2024-10-22
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker expresses agreement with their conversation partner regarding the necessity of implementing a bank tax, which signals a willingness to cooperate toward a shared objective. However, they also raise clarifying and critical questions concerning the details of the tax structure to ensure the solution is effective.
2024-10-21
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speaker supportively references and agrees with the positions of colleagues Rene Kokk and Tõnis Lukas concerning the necessity of prisons and the commemoration of the 1944 fighters. This demonstrates cooperation with colleagues who share similar views, but information regarding a cross-party compromise is lacking.
2024-10-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The cooperation is manifested in sharing common concerns with other opposition members of parliament (e.g., Rain Epler, Rene Kokk), whose questions he references. He also uses the positions of the Chancellor of Justice and the Auditor General to support his arguments. There is no information regarding the search for a compromise with the ruling coalition or cross-party cooperation.
2024-10-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
According to the available data, there is no information regarding any willingness to cooperate or compromise; the speaker’s position is purely confrontational and highly critical of the government’s proposed bill.
2024-10-10
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth sitting, plenary session.
The speaker is actively seeking cross-party cooperation, noting the common concern prevailing in the chamber. He/She proposes procedural solutions (a recess, returning the bill to the committee) in order to establish a unified position on the draft bill that would not violate the conscience of anyone, neither in the opposition nor the coalition.
2024-10-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
The collaborative style is evident in the way colleagues' topics are continued, citing Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart in the context of the Nordica issue. There is no information available regarding openness to compromise or broad-based, cross-party cooperation.
2024-10-07
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
The speaker is open to cooperating with the Minister of Justice, expressing satisfaction should the Minister share his or her position regarding the protection of HÕNTE requirements. He or She proposes a concrete action plan that the Ministry of Justice could implement concerning other ministries to ensure that draft legislation complies with the Constitution.
2024-09-18
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
Data is scarce.
2024-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
There is not enough data.
2024-09-16
The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.
There is no sign of openness to compromise or cooperation; the focus remains on sharply criticizing the opposing sides and raising questions. The coalition's behavior is described as obstruction, which rules out supporting the opposition's bills.
2024-09-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, press briefing.
Insufficient data.
2024-07-22
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu's extraordinary session.
The style of cooperation is purely antagonistic and confrontational, focusing on highlighting the illegality of the government's actions. There are no references to a willingness to compromise, coalition, or cross-party cooperation.
2024-06-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, extra plenary sitting
The speaker stresses cooperation and unity within their faction (EKRE), confirming that they are speaking on behalf of the entire faction. Other potential opponents of the draft bill from other factions are also mentioned, but no direct collaboration is described. No willingness to cooperate with the government is expressed; instead, support for the draft bill is categorically ruled out.
2024-06-12
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.
Shows readiness to support the proposals of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court regarding the simplification and streamlining of criminal proceedings, urging the coalition to take action. However, the relationship with the judiciary as a whole remains confrontational, demanding that they uphold a moral obligation and bear responsibility. Cooperation with SAPTK in previous complaints is also mentioned.
2024-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
Insufficient data.
2024-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The style of cooperation points to similar views shared with other colleagues (Martin Helme is mentioned) who have likewise criticized the opposing side's responses. There is no data regarding cross-party compromise or cooperation.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker bases their arguments on the positions and criticism of entrepreneurs and professional associations, noting that their proposals have not been taken into account. Data regarding inter-factional or coalition cooperation is lacking.
2024-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.
Regarding the child protection bill, there is a call for cross-party cooperation, emphasizing that this is a question of values that should unite all lawmakers. It is noted that the bill received generally supportive feedback in the committee, including from MPs representing the Reform Party, the Social Democrats, and Eesti 200. The readiness to cooperate is high when dealing with topics related to morality and child protection.
2024-05-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-05-29
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, information briefing
The speeches focus on criticizing the government and holding it accountable. There are no references to cooperation, willingness to compromise, or bipartisan action.
2024-05-28
15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
There is insufficient data. The speaker is associated with direct confrontation in this context, and there are no signs indicating cooperation.
2024-05-27
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
The style of cooperation indicates the common conviction of the inner circle (the faction) on the transport issue ("our conviction") and points to the support for the arguments from colleagues (Leo Kunnas) during the abortion debate. Data is missing regarding cross-party cooperation or readiness for compromise.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Domestically, there is a lack of readiness for cooperation because the speaker deems the draft legislation unconstitutional and dangerous. Internationally, however, the speaker urgently calls for unity and cooperation, emphasizing that Estonia should not take the first step, but that the European Union should act in unison to disperse the risks.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing
Not enough data
2024-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-05-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker is prepared to support proposals from colleagues or institutions (the Chancellor of Justice) aimed at solving problems. At the same time, the speaker utilizes this support as a platform to raise deeper and broader legal issues, calling upon institutions (the Constitutional Committee) to reflect on them.
2024-05-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker actively calls for cross-factional cooperation—urging everyone to sit down together and discuss the reliability of elections—stressing that the issue is far too important to be reduced to mere party politics. He welcomes critical questions posed by coalition MPs as a positive step toward a substantive discussion. He makes positive reference to the practice of the 1990s, when the best solutions were sought by transcending factional lines.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.
A collaborative style is evident within the opposition group itself, referencing the amendments proposed by colleagues (Siim Pohlak, Arvo Aller, Martin Helme, Varro Vooglaid), which they improperly attempted to bundle together. There is absolutely no indication of openness to compromise with the ruling coalition; communication is purely confrontational and insists on procedural correctness.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
There is no information regarding cooperation. All statements made are either a direct confrontation with the Prime Minister or procedural criticism aimed at a colleague.
2024-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Not enough data
2024-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
There is not enough data.
2024-05-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The style of collaboration is primarily confrontational and demanding, directed at the opposing party. Mention is made of a colleague’s (Priit Sibul) earlier reference to the inappropriate timing of the proceedings, which indicates a certain internal consistency. There is no reference to broader cross-party cooperation or seeking compromise with the government.
2024-04-30
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session.
The style of cooperation is faction-internal, operating on behalf of the parliamentary group of the Estonian Conservative People's Party. There is a complete absence of any indication that the government is seeking compromise or cross-party cooperation, focusing instead on holding the minister accountable and blocking the draft legislation.
2024-04-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker is confrontational, focusing on the legal accountability of the government and the prime minister, and their moral dissonance. There are no references to cooperation, the search for compromise, or cross-party activity.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
There is not enough data.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, information briefing
There is no data available regarding cooperation with other members of the Riigikogu. He refers to a previous interpretation of the rules of procedure by the session chairman (Mr. Kivimägi) to support his right to ask a supplementary question.
2024-04-10
15th Estonian Parliament, third sitting, information briefing
Not enough data
2024-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
There is insufficient information. The speaker positions themselves in opposition to the government and focuses on submitting formal interpellations. Willingness to cooperate or the search for compromises with other political forces is not mentioned.
2024-04-03
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker references the coalition MPs' previous agreement in principle regarding the need for an effective oversight system, but uses this knowledge more as a challenge than as an offer of cooperation. The overall approach is confrontational and demands that the opposing side take the initiative to improve the situation.
2024-04-03
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
Insufficient information.
2024-04-01
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Not enough data
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker demonstrates collaboration with colleagues who share similar positions (Jaak Valge, Martin Helme), citing their articles and lines of reasoning. No readiness for compromise is apparent regarding the issue of e-voting; instead, a national referendum is proposed as a solution if the parliament and the Supreme Court fail to resolve the problem, indicating a serious commitment to the ideal of democracy.
2024-03-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker is calling for cross-party cooperation, stressing that amending the law is an apolitical matter that needs to be addressed regardless of whether one is in the coalition or the opposition. Emphasis is placed on the necessity of finding an adequate and workable solution that meets the requirements of the rule of law.
2024-03-13
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting.
No data available
2024-03-13
15th Estonian Parliament, third sitting, information briefing
Insufficient data.
2024-03-12
15th Riigikogu, 3rd plenary sitting
The speaker references their colleague Jaak Valge, who explained the historical context, suggesting cooperation within their own political group. However, the style adopted toward the broader parliamentary majority is confrontational and accusatory, expressing hope that the situation will change, yet showing no openness to compromise with the majority.
2024-03-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The speeches are purely oppositional and critical, focusing on challenging the actions of the prime minister and the government. There is a complete absence of any reference to cooperation, willingness to compromise, or bipartisan activity.
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing
There is not enough data.
2024-03-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The collaborative style is evident in the thorough citation of Martin Ehala's article, utilizing his arguments both to support one's own position and to frame the question. Data regarding inter-party or legislative cooperation is absent.
2024-03-04
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Insufficient data
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The style of cooperation is fact-based, seeking dialogue with the Minister either to confirm or refute earlier statements. The speaker also references specific cases presented by other colleagues (Colleague Odinets), demonstrating awareness of the contributions made by other members of parliament.
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The speaker shows solidarity with opposition colleagues (Jaak Valge, Andres Aule), defending them from both the PPA proceedings and the reprimand issued by the session chair. There is no information regarding cooperation or the seeking of compromises with the coalition.
2024-02-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The style of collaboration is open and supportive towards the presenter, as he fundamentally agrees with all of their viewpoints. However, any cooperation or compromise with the government is ruled out, as the speaker sees no prospect of the government taking the crucial points into consideration.
2024-02-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
There isn't enough data.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.
The collaborative style is inquisitive and respectful, seeking empirical confirmation or opinion from the presenter, given their long-term experience as a faculty member. The objective is to obtain an expert assessment regarding the consequences of the policy.
2024-02-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
There is insufficient data.
2024-01-25
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker emphasizes the necessity of involving external parties in the legislative process, demanding the inclusion of interest groups and experts before decisions are taken. This signals an openness to broad-based cooperation and a commitment to thoroughness, contrasting sharply with the commission's narrow decision-making process.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker endorses the proposals made by experts (e.g., Priit Pikamäe) aimed at improving law-making and expresses approval for the substantive remarks delivered by colleagues. Data is lacking regarding inter-party cooperation or readiness for compromise concerning the draft legislation.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
Not enough data
2024-01-23
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speakers expressed their support and gratitude to the rapporteur for raising these crucial issues, suggesting collaboration with the topic's initiator. Specifically, they support the proposal to investigate the carcinogenic effect, emphasizing that there should be no grounds for objection. However, there is no data available regarding broader cross-party cooperation.
2024-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The style of cooperation is confrontational and demanding towards the government. A point raised by a colleague (Martin Helme) was noted in support, indicating common intra-factional positions, but broader cooperation with other parties is not mentioned.
2024-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker calls for a substantive discussion and debate, urging that the draft bill not be immediately rejected but rather discussed during the second and third readings. He/She also encourages coalition MPs to participate in the debate and pose critical questions, signaling a desire for a constructive, though adversarial, dialogue.
2024-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
Data is missing. All remarks are focused on criticizing the government and raising questions; the search for cooperation or compromise is not reflected.
2024-01-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker is cooperative, offering their readiness to amend the bill through proposed changes during the second reading, and promising to contribute ideas regarding government bills. They call upon the coalition to find a solution, even if it is not achieved through the bill they presented, and note that ministry representatives on the committee agreed that the problem is real. They are also prepared to collaborate on improving bills introduced by the government.
2024-01-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The cooperative style is aimed at securing the support of colleagues for a specific draft bill. The speaker directly requests support, which indicates a desire to achieve legislative cooperation within the parliament.