By Plenary Sessions: Peeter Ernits

The main opponents are the current government/coalition, who are criticized for ignoring the people, low public trust, and unethical policies. Specific accusations concern the alleged siphoning of wealth by the Social Democrats (SDE) and the "wind troika" through subsidies. The previous EKRE government and Martin Helme are also criticized for supporting the Sõnajalg brothers' wind farm.

Strong opposition is directed at the government’s actions, which critics accuse of exhausting and hating the populace, citing public opinion polls where 80% of respondents reported feeling worn out. Specific criticism is also leveled at former Prime Minister Kaja Kallas ("completely crazy") and the Minister of Defense for military bluster. The opposition is primarily policy- and performance-based, accusing the government of losing focus.

The primary criticism is directed at the government (the minister) and the decision-making processes of the Cultural Endowment of Estonia (Kultuurkapital), which are considered irregular and unjust. The critique targets both the devaluation of parliamentary work and a specific funding decision concerning "Estonia's most popular president."

The criticism is directed at the e-voting system and its trustworthiness, implicitly pointing toward the administrators of the process. There are no direct attacks on political opponents or specific individuals.

The main opposition is directed at the Government of the Republic and the coalition, criticizing their political instability and rushed decision-making (e.g., the absence of impact analyses). Criticism is leveled both at the political execution and the competence of specific individuals (Aivar Kokk), who have been harshly assessed by the government. The government is also criticized for the loss of public trust stemming from the wind farm disputes.

The primary adversary is the government, which faces intense criticism regarding both the substance of its policies and procedural deficiencies (specifically, the lack of impact assessments). This criticism is fundamental, challenging the government's legitimacy by comparing it to an enemy that is draining the nation.

The primary backlash targets the actions taken by the previous government and its key figures (Kaja Kallas, Läänemets, Kristina Kallas, Jürgen Ligi) regarding the 2.6 billion euro energy plan. The criticism is intense and focuses on ethical questions, as well as suspicions of corruption and wealth redistribution. Läänemets is directly referred to as the "root of evil" who forced the plan through.

The speaker is in strong opposition to the government, criticizing both the Kaja Kallas and Kristen Michal administrations for overburdening the populace. The critique targets both the substance of the policy (harmful laws) and the procedural side (fast-track adoption and the lack of impact assessments). He criticizes coalition MPs for tossing the amendments proposed by the opposition (Isamaa and EKRE) "into the trash with a straight face," and points out the absence of coalition members during the debate.

The main opponent is the ruling coalition, which has been dubbed the "minority government." Criticism is aimed both at political decisions (the car tax, expenditures) and procedural deficiencies (killing proposed bills and simply rubber-stamping them in committees). Opponents are attacked intensely and personally, calling into question their moral responsibility to the people in rural areas.

The primary targets of criticism are the Minister of Finance (accused of wasting time and engaging in busywork) and former Prime Minister Kaja Kallas, whose departure has left the economy in a catastrophic state. The criticism is intense, accusing the government of misplaced priorities at a time when the country faces acute problems.

Insufficient data.