By Plenary Sessions: Peeter Ernits

Economic perspectives are strongly opposed to energy projects demanding massive subsidies (billion-euro grants), such as offshore wind farms and pumped-storage facilities, which are viewed as a grand-scale siphoning of wealth. The speaker demands transparency and an investigation, arguing that these schemes place enormous burdens on the public for decades.

Economic perspectives focus on the financial strain on the population, emphasizing that over half of all groceries are purchased based on affordability rather than nutritional value. This highlights concerns regarding the high cost of living and the government's failed economic policies, which have driven a large segment of the population into hardship.

No data available

There isn't enough data.

The economic perspectives focus on the transparent and efficient distribution of state subsidies (2.6 billion) and concern regarding the impact of energy policy on electricity prices. Political disagreements over land tax regulation are also addressed, emphasizing the need for clear rules.

The economic views are manifested in opposition to government decisions that burden the populace, specifically referencing resistance to onerous economic measures. No concrete positions regarding taxes or spending are presented; instead, the focus is placed solely on the negative impact on the people.

The speaker is strongly opposed to the large state-directed investments (€2.6 billion), which he believes constitute the channeling of taxpayers' money directly into the pockets of renewable energy businessmen. He emphasizes the necessity of fiscal responsibility and transparency, criticizing policies that favor the rapid and secretive redistribution of wealth.

The speaker is strongly pro-business and opposes government policies detrimental to entrepreneurs, particularly citing the vehicle tax as an example. He highlights the case of a catering business owner for whom the registration tax and modification costs levied on his 24 vans are economically devastating. He opposes the high taxes and regulations imposed by the state that are exhausting the public.

The speaker is strongly opposed to the car tax, calling it the former minister's "pet project." He/She raises concerns about the appropriateness of state spending (70,000 euros) "during a difficult time," pointing to the necessity of fiscal discipline and criticizing the careless use of public funds.

The speaker expressed profound concern regarding Estonia's lack of economic growth and the catastrophic state of the economy. They criticized the gender balance directive, calling it an irrelevant regulation that does nothing to improve either economic growth or the financial well-being of the populace. They suggested that it would be wiser to simply pay the fine rather than adopting the directive, thereby saving time for tackling more pressing issues.

Insufficient data.