By Plenary Sessions: Peeter Ernits

The style of cooperation is primarily confrontational and critical, focusing on thwarting government plans and demanding investigations. However, the speaker emphasizes the common goal of ensuring a better life for the Estonian people, regardless of party affiliation, which suggests a desire for shared outcomes.

The speaker engages with colleagues (Reili, Kalle), recognizing their appeals concerning the support of women, but immediately leverages these appeals as a platform for broader criticism of the government. He/She votes in favor of the draft bill, despite strong criticism regarding both the procedure and the focus. The text does not mention any direct cooperation or readiness to compromise with other parties.

The collaborative style is formally polite ("Dear Madam Minister"), yet substantively confrontational and demanding, focusing on the Minister's accountability and the clarification of her views. There is no information available regarding attempts to seek cooperation with other members of the Riigikogu.

The style of interaction is formal and polite when addressing the rapporteur during the parliamentary question-and-answer session. There is no indication of cross-party collaboration or willingness to compromise.

Although the speaker acknowledges the potential cooperation between the opposition and the coalition ("it's excellent if the opposition and coalition work in sync"), he is skeptical about its scope, demanding precise data. He also stresses the need for internal clarity and agreements within the committee, criticizing the inability of two intelligent people (Annely and Aivar Kokk) to reach a consensus regarding the land tax.

Not enough data

There is no direct reference to cross-party cooperation, but the speaker addresses the current prime minister, attempting to convince him to speak plainly and acknowledging that he is more reasonable than his predecessor. He is collaborating with external experts and calls upon colleagues (investigative journalists) to research the topic further, offering them a subject worthy of the Bonnier Prize.

The speaker demonstrates a willingness to cooperate with the Chancellor of Justice, promising to implement his amendments, but there is no mention of cooperation with parliamentary colleagues. He supportively references the attempts by the opposition parties (Isamaa and EKRE) to amend the car tax, but stresses their failure due to the coalition's opposition.

The style of cooperation is strictly oppositional and controlling. The speaker concentrates on criticizing and challenging the government’s actions, with no mention of a willingness to compromise or any indication of cross-party cooperation.

No data available

Colleagues are addressed respectfully, which suggests a willingness to operate within the parliamentary structure. However, the speech does not mention specific cooperation, readiness for compromise, or cross-party activity.