By Months: Jaak Aab

Total Months: 10

Fully Profiled: 10

All Categories Political Position Topic Expertise Rhetorical Style Activity Patterns Opposition Stance Collaboration Style Regional Focus Economic Views Social Issues Legislative Focus
12.2024

12 Speeches

They are not expressing direct opposition, but they are noting the lack of support for the Isamaa faction's proposals within the Economic Affairs Committee concerning the mandatory audit thresholds. The approach is more constructive than confrontational, focusing on finding compromise solutions rather than attacking the opposition.
Details View Details
11.2024

20 Speeches

The criticism leveled at the Isamaa party regarding the delayed land tax reform is moderate, though it does accuse them of failing to meet their obligations for two decades. The counter-arguments presented are fact-based, drawing upon historical examples. The tone avoids sharp confrontation, favoring instead constructive criticism directed at political opponents.
Details View Details
10.2024

5 Speeches

It takes a forceful stance against the Moscow Patriarchate and its supporters, declaring them supporters of terrorism. It sharply criticizes Riigikogu members who do not take security issues seriously enough. The opposition is principled and uncompromising regarding security threats.
Details View Details
09.2024

2 Speeches

There is not enough data.
Details View Details
06.2024

4 Speeches

The speaker voices criticism against Priit Sibul, accusing him of misleading the public about the binding nature of the nuclear energy decision. He uses direct confrontation, asking, "Why are you trying to show..."—a move that demonstrates strong opposition to political manipulation. The criticism is primarily procedural and fact-based.
Details View Details
05.2024

33 Speeches

The primary opposition is directed against the activities of the Moscow Patriarchate and Patriarch Kirill, whom they label a war criminal and an inciter of aggression. They also criticize the inaction of previous governments regarding land valuation issues and the insufficient level of state investment during periods of crisis. The stance is principled, but avoids personal attacks.
Details View Details
04.2024

3 Speeches

It adopts a strongly oppositional stance toward the Moscow Patriarchate and Russia, declaring them a threat to public order in Estonia. The criticism is clearly ideological and security-based, ruling out any compromise with institutions supporting aggression. No direct opposition is evident in domestic political issues.
Details View Details
03.2024

8 Speeches

The criticism primarily targets the government's approach to cutting education spending, labeling the claims regarding excessive costs as "highly arbitrary and factually incorrect." They oppose the simplified restructuring of the school network, cautioning against the use of "Excel spreadsheets" and purely mechanical solutions. Regarding constitutional institutions, they criticize the executive branch being pressured via budgetary means.
Details View Details
02.2024

3 Speeches

The speaker consistently criticizes the government and ministers, especially for their inaction during the 2022 energy crisis. The criticism is primarily policy-focused, zeroing in on specific failures such as the universal service issue and deficiencies in economic policy. The attacks are measured but sustained.
Details View Details
01.2024

1 Speeches

A direct stance of opposition is not evident. Rather, it expresses concern about the system's shortcomings than offering direct criticism toward specific individuals or groups. The approach is constructive, not confrontational.
Details View Details
Back to Profiling