By Agendas: Kristo Enn Vaga

The political focus is on developing the defense industry and technology, which is viewed as a critical national objective. Emphasis is placed on the need to expand the defense industry’s reach beyond the Defense Forces, involving the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications (MKM) and other market players. This position strongly supports strategic state guidance.

The political position strongly supports the continuation of the defense forces' international missions, particularly the UN-led UNTSO operation in the Middle East. Emphasis is placed on the historical continuity of the mission and the increase in Estonia's contribution (the number of defense personnel will grow to up to six observers). The framework of this position is clearly policy- and commitment-based, focusing on the continuity of national defense and foreign policy.

The political position is strongly supportive of Draft Act 707 OE, which addresses the contribution of the Estonian Defence Forces to the United Kingdom’s Joint Expeditionary Force (JEF). This stance is clearly policy-driven, emphasizing the assurance of security, the strengthening of the deterrence posture, and the role of the United Kingdom as a crucial security partner. The continued contribution of up to 24 defence personnel in 2026 is supported, as this is viewed as providing significant operational and training opportunities for Estonia.

The political focus is on economic and tax policy issues, particularly the effect of the income tax increase on consumption. Emphasis is also placed on the direct impact of global geopolitical events (the Russia-Ukraine ceasefire) on the Estonian economy and stock markets. The approach is rather policy- and results-driven, seeking expert assessment regarding controversial economic decisions.

The political focus is heavily centered on national security and the population's crisis preparedness, underscoring the necessity of learning from the experiences of the war in Ukraine. The speaker firmly backs the proposed amendments to the Emergency Situation Act, which would mandate the construction of shelters in all new large buildings. This stance is strong and value-driven, prioritizing the safeguarding of human life and security. The Reform Party faction is highly supportive of this draft bill, aiming to ensure the safety of the Estonian people.

The political stance centers on the possibility of removing religious associations from the income tax exemption register, specifically focusing on 35 associations connected to the Moscow Patriarchate. This position is both inquisitive and challenging, stressing that these associations must operate in the public interest, which raises doubts about their current activities. The framework of this stance is clearly rooted in policy and law.

A strong, values-driven focus on national defense and security, prioritizing it even at the expense of immediate welfare. The speaker vigorously supports increasing defense expenditures above 5% of GDP and underscores Estonia's role as an example within NATO and the EU. The political framework is clearly results-oriented and values-based, stressing the pricelessness of freedom and the long-term threat posed by Russia.

The political stance involves a robust defense of the government's actions and firm opposition to the opposition's proposed bill, given that its core objective has already been met by the current administration. The primary focus is supporting the move to make sustainability reports voluntary for all companies. This position is distinctly results-oriented, highlighting the government's achievements and its correct policy direction.

The political focus centers on strict adherence to procedural rules and a substantive discussion of the ongoing draft bill (589 SE). The position is highlighted that speeches must pertain to the bill currently under consideration, not arbitrary topics, thereby stressing procedural correctness. Criticism is also leveled at the discrepancy between a colleague's actual conduct (absence during the vote) and their public support (speaking at the podium), which points to a focus on political integrity and performance.

Strong support for enhancing the continuity of vital services and national resilience. The political focus is on comprehensive national defense based on risk analysis, stressing that all sectors, not just military ones, are vulnerable in a crisis situation. This position is strongly rooted in policy and security considerations, aiming to ensure the lives of the Estonian people are disrupted as little as possible.

The political emphasis is on procedural clarity and institutional accountability in setting priorities for national sports infrastructure. The speaker asks who should issue the state mandate and determine the order of priorities (the Riigikogu, the Ministry of Culture, or the EOC), expressing concern over policy implementation and governance. The focus is strongly policy- and procedure-based.

The political position is one of strong support for the draft amendment to the Emergency Situation Act (589 SE), which aims to ensure the continuity of vital services and mitigate the risk of disruptions. The focus is on a political solution that mandates two technologically distinct communication options for data located in a foreign country. This stance is centered on policy and risk management, emphasizing the securing of service continuity.

The speaker supports the consideration of the moderately significant Bill (585 SE) in the Riigikogu, which concerns amendments to the Political Parties Act and the Credit Institutions Act. The main political position is the necessity of establishing a period for active election campaigning at the statutory level to ensure legal clarity regarding accountability. The framework of this position is clearly policy- and procedure-centric.

The political focus is on national defense and security, emphasizing the government's achievements (1.6 billion secured, 3.7% of GDP allocated for defense spending). We support strategic, quality-driven ammunition procurement and oppose irresponsible borrowing. Staffing and personnel decisions are heavily results-based, underscoring Estonia's standing within NATO metrics.

The political focus is heavily centered on financing national defense and security via a dedicated security levy. The speaker strongly advocates for increasing defense spending above 3% of GDP, stressing that this is essential for effective deterrence and guaranteeing Estonia's capacity for victory. This position is fact-based, concentrating on the acquisition of specific defense capabilities and Estonia's role within NATO.

The speaker strongly supports the fulfillment of the Defence Forces’ international obligations by extending the deployment of up to three servicemen in the UN peacekeeping operation UNTSO until the end of 2025. This political stance is clearly policy-driven, emphasizing international cooperation and the participation of NATO countries in the peacekeeping operation. Support for the bill is strong, further confirmed by the unanimous approval within the leading committee.

The political focus is on international security cooperation, strongly supporting the deployment of up to 24 personnel from the Defence Forces within the United Kingdom's Joint Expeditionary Force. This position is policy-based, emphasizing the fulfillment of Estonia's international obligations for the maintenance of peace and security, pursuant to Chapter 6 or 7 of the UN Charter. The speaker confirms that national defense and the defense budget are a priority for the government.

The political position focuses on the legal and procedural accuracy concerning the use of the Defence Forces and the Defence League in international operations. The speaker emphasizes that the units operating within the framework of the Defence League's reserve training assembly, which were sent to assist Poland, do not fall under the scope of the draft bill (479 OE) currently under discussion. The stance is strongly policy- and procedure-centric, stressing the correct legal classification.

The political position is heavily focused on developing the defense industry as a national priority and strengthening Estonia’s defense capabilities. The speaker vigorously supports a draft law that simplifies bureaucracy and creates a more competitive environment for arms manufacturing. The overall policy framing is policy- and results-driven, emphasizing that the development of the defense industry is both an obligation and an opportunity.

The political position strongly supports extending the mandate for Estonian defense forces personnel participating in international peacekeeping operations under the UN UNTSO mission. This stance is policy- and procedure-focused, highlighting the constructive and unanimous handling of the draft legislation within the Riigikogu. The speaker stresses that this is the tenth and final mission draft bill being processed today.

The political emphasis is on national defense and the fulfillment of international obligations. The speaker strongly supports Estonia’s contribution to the UK-led Joint Expeditionary Force (JEF), calling it an excellent format that enables rapid deployment. This support is based on policy and commitments, confirming the readiness to continue contributing up to 24 military personnel in 2025 as well.

The political platform is strongly rooted in security and values, emphasizing the threat posed by Russian aggression and the urgent need to rapidly boost Europe's defense capabilities. The speaker vigorously supports EU enlargement (Ukraine, Moldova, Western Balkans) both in the interest of security and to enhance the competitiveness of the internal market. Estonia is viewed as an active player and a key advocate that should be shaping European policy, particularly in the areas of digitalization and foreign and security policy. The policy approach is highly results-oriented, citing Estonia's economic growth within the EU as evidence.

The political position involves strong support for enhancing the nation's crisis resilience and expanding the regulation of vital services, underscoring Estonia's pioneering role in whole-of-society defense. The objective is to safeguard the life and health of residents and ensure the state functions effectively in all circumstances, a necessity driven both by the relevant EU directive and the regional security situation. The speaker stresses the need for swift action, pointing to the October 18 deadline for the directive to enter into force. The political framework is clearly policy- and security-driven.

The political focus is currently centered on state financing mechanisms, particularly the issuance of government bonds targeting retail investors. The speaker stresses the priority of funding national defense, actively seeking alternative methods to secure loans under better conditions than those available on the international capital market. This represents a policy-driven approach aimed at finding new financial solutions to meet national strategic objectives.

The political stance demonstrates strong support for the proposed legislation aimed at enhancing road safety. This focus includes improving cyclist safety (mandating a 1.5-meter passing distance) and regulating the parking of light personal mobility devices within the urban environment. This position is clearly policy-driven, underscoring the necessity of responding to citizen initiatives and establishing rules for emerging modes of transport. The speaker expresses great satisfaction that the bill has reached its final phase, which is indicative of robust support.

The political focus is on ensuring the nation's crisis preparedness and the resilience of vital services, emphasizing the need to address "compound crises." It strongly supports the processing of Draft Bill 426 SE to ensure the timely transposition of the CER Directive, which is framed as essential for the functioning of society. The political position is strongly policy- and results-based, concentrating on the rapid advancement of legislation.

The political focus is on national defense and security, which are deemed worthy of an extraordinary investment (1.5 billion). This stance is strongly supported and justified by the opinion of the Commander of the Defense Forces. Simultaneously, the necessity of stimulating the economy is highlighted alongside budget cuts and tax hikes, effectively linking security investments with economic policy.

The political position is strongly centered on promoting sports policy and physical activity, viewing this as a national priority and an excellent investment in public health. The speaker vigorously supports greater involvement of private funding in the sports sector, stressing social responsibility and sustainable development rather than purely marketing objectives. The position is clearly policy- and results-driven, emphasizing a rapid return on investment for the state.

The political position is strongly value-based, centered on providing comprehensive assistance to Ukraine, which is viewed as an existential issue for Estonia. The speaker emphasizes Estonia's role as an international aid provider, mentioning both military assistance and the preparation of sanctions against Russia. The goal is to help Ukraine win the war and ensure Russia clearly loses.

The central political stance addresses national defense and the structure of the border guard, broadly advocating for stronger border protection, exemplified by the ongoing discussion regarding the establishment of a Baltic defense zone. The presenter communicated the National Defense Committee's position, which was to withhold support for the draft legislation, given that a majority of affirmative votes was not secured (4 in favor, 4 against), thereby stressing the importance of the procedural framework. The political focus is primarily directed toward the complexities inherent in policy implementation and the necessity of conducting a comprehensive assessment regarding the need for legislative amendments.

The political focus is heavily centered on foreign and security policy. Firm support is expressed for the government's activities in providing comprehensive assistance to Ukraine and supporting the Estonian defense industry to guarantee security. Important questions are raised concerning the consultations regarding the opening of a Taiwanese representative office and the preservation of the principle of unanimity in the European Union's foreign and security policy. These stances are aimed at clarifying and affirming the policy.

The speaker strongly supports the procedural advancement of Bill 340 SE, focusing specifically on refining the draft legislation and postponing its effective date. The political stance is primarily procedural and policy-driven, emphasizing the need for consensus decisions within the leading committee. Support for the bill remains strong, centering on ensuring its smooth passage during the second reading.