By Plenary Sessions: Aleksandr Tšaplõgin

Total Sessions: 6

Fully Profiled: 6

2024-10-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The main opponent is the government, which is being criticized for its policies (tax hikes, wasteful spending) and ideological inconsistency (violation of free market principles). The criticism is intense and uncompromising; the faction proposes rejecting the legislation during the first reading. The government is also accused of imposing obligations on local municipalities without providing the necessary resources.
2024-10-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing
The primary adversary is the government, and specifically the Minister of Finance, whose policies and public statements are facing sharp criticism. The criticism targets both political decisions (such as energy subsidies) and the Minister’s rhetoric, which is being actively used to discredit him (the "Kremlin applause" narrative, the anecdote about eating canned goods). The intensity of these attacks is high, effectively calling into question the legitimacy of the government’s communication strategy.
2024-10-15
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The main opponent is the government, which is being sharply criticized for policy-driven unfair taxation and raising excise duties. The criticism is intense and points to a fundamental opposition to the government's economic philosophy, accusing them of taking from the poor.
2024-10-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The primary adversary is "your government" and the minister, who is facing sharp criticism over political decisions regarding healthcare funding. The critique is intense and rooted in values, specifically accusing the government of targeting the wallets of the poor rather than the wealthy.
2024-10-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
The speaker is clearly taking an opposition stance, criticizing the government for its economic policy and the handling of the state budget procedure. The criticism is aimed at political inaction (specifically, support for local food) and procedural lack of transparency (the comprehensibility of the budget).
2024-10-08
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The opposition is indirect and anticipatory, as the speaker assumes the bill will be rejected. Specific opponents or the substance of the criticism are not detailed; instead, the focus is on the procedural outcome.