By Plenary Sessions: Aleksandr Tšaplõgin

The speakers demonstrate knowledge regarding the budget and state expenditures, citing specific figures related to Rail Baltic (a billion euros) and green energy subsidies (hundreds of millions of euros). They show an ability to link the economic situation with social consequences, such as the deterioration of mental health. One speaker emphasizes that although his views are based on a non-academic understanding, they stem from a practical grasp of the country's core problems.

The text demonstrates knowledge of energy policy, referencing the hundreds of millions of euros paid to green energy producers and the weather-dependent nature of production. Also evident is the ability to analyze and challenge the political rhetoric of government members, raising questions about the role of the parliamentary opposition in the context of anti-state activities.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in the field of fiscal policy and excise duties (electricity, fuel), emphasizing their macroeconomic consequences. The arguments are supported by referencing scientists and their warnings about the negative effects of excise duty increases, specifically concerning the standard of living and potential losses.

The speaker demonstrates awareness of the issues surrounding healthcare funding and alternative taxation options, such as a special tax on bank profits. Specific data or technical details are not referenced; the focus is instead on the political decision of where to source the funds.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in the field of economic and fiscal policy, linking the decline in the standard of living to the reduction in local food production. Regarding the budget, he/she supports his/her criticism concerning the budget's lack of clarity by citing the opinions of external authorities (the Chancellor of Justice, economists).

No data available