By Plenary Sessions: Aleksandr Tšaplõgin

The political position is strongly oppositional to the government's budget and tax policy, stressing the negative impact of tax hikes on economic security. The main issues are the state's inability to resolve fundamental problems such as boosting the birth rate, achieving rapid economic growth, and eradicating poverty. The criticism is intense, focusing on government waste and the cutting of benefits for the elderly, making it both value-driven and performance-based.

The political position is strongly oppositional and highly critical of the government's actions. The main issues are the affordability and reliability of green energy subsidies, as well as the government's rhetoric which equates criticism with anti-state activity. The focus is on the credibility of the government's actions and the ministers' messaging, casting doubt on their ability to ensure an affordable standard of living. The stance is sharply critical and outcome-oriented.

The political position is strongly opposed to the government's fiscal policy, focusing on unjust redistribution where money is taken from the poor and given to the rich. The speaker firmly opposes the raising of electricity and fuel excise duties, arguing that this lowers people's standard of living and harms businesses. The position is framed both on the basis of values (justice) and outcomes (economic damage).

The political position is heavily focused on social justice and healthcare funding. The speaker forcefully opposes government plans that burden patients and supports the proposal to introduce a special tax on bank profits. The framework is value-driven, emphasizing the protection of the poor at the expense of the wealthy.

The political position is strongly critical of the government and results-oriented, focusing on economic failures (rising prices, declining living standards). The speaker highlights two main issues: the decline in local food production, which is viewed as a security risk, and the lack of transparency in the draft state budget. The stance is clearly oppositional, demanding concrete measures from the government.

The political position is unequivocally supportive of the specific draft legislation currently under discussion. While support has been voiced directly, it is accompanied by pragmatic pessimism regarding the bill's adoption by the full assembly, suggesting a political awareness of the procedural hurdles involved.