By Months: Madis Timpson

The speaker is collaborative, thoroughly detailing the discussions and arguments within the committee involving the minister, officials, and colleagues alike. Emphasis is placed on the consensus-based decisions made during the handling of the draft legislation and the openness shown in inviting maritime law specialists to the committee. This cooperation also includes making proposals for the conclusion of international agreements.

The individual demonstrates a strong willingness to cooperate and an ability to compromise within the legislative process. The speaker highlights the successful consensus achieved concerning the license plate recognition camera bill, noting that various critical institutions—including the Chancellor of Justice, the Data Protection Inspectorate, and various ministries—ultimately reached a unified solution. He serves as a mediator, ensuring that all draft legislation aligns with the expectations of every involved party.

The speaker is consensus-driven in committee work, noting unanimous decisions (6-0, consensus) on several occasions. They define inclusion pragmatically: listening to all opinions, but not accommodating 100% of the wishes. They collaborate both with other members of parliament (Liina Kersna) and with ministry officials (Johann Vootele Mäevere).

The speaker is cooperative, acknowledging previous compromises and expressing hope that the necessary amendments (such as changes to the General Part of the Penal Code) will be implemented during the bill’s proceedings. They emphasize the need to consult with business organizations and standardize legislative processes, for instance, through a roundtable of legislative lawyers.

The style of cooperation is open and supportive towards independent institutions, expressing strong backing for the Chancellor of Justice's proposal. The politician is receptive to practical solutions, such as allowing child support debtors to make payments in installments. Furthermore, he references points made by other colleagues (Mr. Jaanson, Mr. Aller), demonstrating his active engagement in the debate on the floor.

The speaker is cooperative and procedurally correct, chairing the committee discussions that involve both the ministries and the Chancellor of Justice. He/She emphasizes that many procedural decisions (such as sending the draft bill to the plenary session) were made consensually within the committee, which demonstrates openness to compromise and smooth collaboration.

The style of cooperation is consensual and procedure-focused, emphasizing that several procedural decisions (placing items on the agenda, appointing a representative, concluding the first reading) were adopted by consensus in the Social Affairs Committee. This points to a willingness to reach agreements with colleagues in order to move legislative work forward.