By Plenary Sessions: Rain Epler

The speaker demonstrates profound expertise in the fields of energy and economics, utilizing data and correlations (graphs showing electricity prices versus the share of renewable energy) and citing specific examples of the collapse of European industries (steel manufacturers, fertilizer producers, aluminum production, Volkswagen). Furthermore, he exhibits knowledge regarding constitutional interpretation and international conventions (specifically, the definitions of gender-based violence).

The speaker demonstrates deep technical expertise in the field of financial and tax legislation, accurately citing provisions of the Value Added Tax Act and referencing specific rules concerning the deduction of input VAT. In their argumentation, they utilize data from the Pension Centre regarding administrative burden and the actual wishes of the public, emphasizing the detailed impact of the proposed legislation.

The speaker demonstrates profound knowledge of energy policy, detailing subsidy schemes, waste management funds, CO2 charges, and the technical aspects of grid stability and energy storage. Particular emphasis is placed on the economic inefficiency that results from the necessity of building a stable backup power plant of equal capacity alongside renewable energy facilities.

The expert assessment is clearly focused on tax policy, including evaluating the impact of progressive income tax on various income groups (€1,000 vs €5,000) and the nature of regressive taxes. Knowledge is also demonstrated regarding the procedural limitations of the Riigikogu Rules of Procedure and Internal Rules Act, specifically by questioning the admissibility of the presenter's personal opinion.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in the economic logic and procurement processes of national defense, particularly regarding the operational capacity and readiness of domestic drone manufacturers. Specific concepts are utilized, such as a "readiness retainer" and guaranteeing production volumes via contractual agreements.

The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding the history and legal status of the monument, referencing the specific year of the copy (2004) and its location in the museum. He relies in his argument on an expert assessment commissioned by the University of Tartu, which confirmed the absence of symbolism on the monument. Furthermore, he is knowledgeable in criticizing legal precedents and the application of the law, especially concerning the grounds for confiscation.

The speaker demonstrates expertise on environmental and land use topics (restrictions, compensations, funding for mire restoration) and in administrative issues within the education sector (control of IT infrastructure, bureaucracy). The speaker uses specific terminology and demands concrete figures (Estonian vs. European funding for mire restoration). They demonstrate accuracy by correcting the minister on mathematical details (30% vs. 33.3%).