By Plenary Sessions: Rain Epler

The speaker is very active in the plenary session, participating in several debates (security, budget, social issues) and submitting both substantive questions and procedural complaints to the session chair. Their operational pattern involves a detailed analysis of previous debates and transcripts, which is then used to accuse opponents.

All the speeches originate from a single Riigikogu information session, which demonstrates active participation in the parliament's question rounds. The speaker repeatedly employs clarifying and procedural questions in order to compel the opposing side to answer the original question.

The speaker is active during plenary sessions, posing questions to ministers and offering detailed arguments regarding proposed legislation. Reference is made to previous legislative activity, such as the submission of the bank tax bill 'last summer'.

The speaker is an active submitter of interpellations, having co-authored the inquiry submitted to the Minister of Justice and Digital Affairs on September 11th. His/Her pattern of activity includes the detailed review and analysis of transcripts and video recordings from previous sittings (last week's) in order to monitor the conduct of the ministers. He/She frequently intervenes during the sitting with questions and comments.

The speaker was highly active during the plenary session on October 16th, repeatedly questioning ministers on the topic of the budget and tax increases, and delivering a presentation arguing for the rejection of the draft bill. They also referenced the debate held the previous day with the Minister of Finance.

The speaker is highly active during the session, repeatedly posing questions to rapporteurs and ministers, and taking part in multiple rounds of negotiations. Their activity pattern encompasses both detailed budget scrutiny and broad ideological speeches, culminating in the submission of a motion to reject the draft legislation.

All interventions were made during a single plenary session, which indicates active participation in the debates concerning questions and draft legislation. The pattern demonstrates consistent challenging of the minister's responses and the submission of repeated questions when the initial answer was vague or evasive.

Not enough data

The pattern of activity indicates active participation in the Riigikogu (Parliament) information hour, by posing questions to the minister based on recent international media coverage. The speaker closely monitors the foreign press and utilizes this information to scrutinize the government's actions.

The Member is active in plenary sessions, participating in Question Time and submitting follow-up questions that reference earlier inquiries made by other colleagues (Aivar Kokk). This demonstrates routine engagement with parliamentary scrutiny mechanisms.

The data indicates active participation in the plenary session, repeatedly posing questions to the minister and delivering a critical summation at the conclusion of the debate. The speaker consistently raises the issue of infrastructure funding.