By Plenary Sessions: Rain Epler

The speaker was very active during the plenary session, posing questions to the minister and the rapporteurs, and delivering speeches on behalf of the faction on two important topics (child protection and nuclear energy). They were forced to unexpectedly replace a colleague, which indicates flexibility and a clear readiness to intervene in the debate. They participated in both the question-and-answer session and the longer presentations.

The modes of action are limited to participating in plenary sessions and actively intervening, raising both procedural questions and motions to interrupt the reading of draft legislation. The speaker is an active participant in the debate, posing critical questions to the rapporteurs.

The speaker is an active questioner during plenary sessions, raising both substantive questions and procedural remarks to the presiding officer concerning the need for ministerial oversight. He/She participates in the debate, referencing prior conversations and discussions.

The data reveals two instances of speaking during a single plenary session, indicating active participation in the question round.

Data is available for only one plenary session question, which indicates participation in parliamentary Question Time and the scrutiny of government activities.

The data is limited to two speeches delivered during a single session day (09.05.2024) at the Riigikogu plenary sitting, which indicates active participation in the ongoing discussion. There is no information available regarding the frequency of appearances, meetings, or travel.

The speaker is highly active during the plenary session, repeatedly intervening both with procedural questions and in substantive debates (e.g., the bank tax). A pattern emerges where questions are posed immediately following the conclusion of the previous agenda item or in response to clarifications provided by the Chair, demonstrating careful and attentive engagement.

No data available.

The speaker actively participates in plenary sessions, posing questions to ministers regarding political accountability and social policy. The reference to previous debates held in the same chamber indicates regular and consistent involvement in parliamentary work and the questioning of ministers.