By Months: Timo Suslov

There is not enough data.

The statement contains no direct criticism or opposition; rather, it is aimed at the minister for the purpose of obtaining explanations and economic analysis. Insufficient data.

No opposition exists; the speaker notes that not a single proposal was received by the deadline for submitting amendments, which suggests either widespread support or passive opposition. No criticism is being directed toward any interest group or political opponent.

There is no opposition. The speech focuses on highlighting the consensus reached within the committee and conveying procedural decisions.

Not enough data.

The opposition is directed at a draft bill which seeks to impose financial coercive measures for the absence of government members from committees, deeming this disproportionate. The criticism is primarily political-philosophical (ideological) and procedural, rather than being aimed at specific individuals. The objection is based on the view that the legal provisions governing ministerial responsibility are already adequate.