By Months: Timo Suslov
Total Months: 5
Fully Profiled: 5
10.2025
1 Speeches
The style of cooperation is supportive, yet demanding; the speaker approves the changes but requires the minister to provide an additional economic impact analysis and confirmation that the matter has been discussed by the Economic Cabinet. This indicates a readiness for cooperation, provided it is based on thorough economic justification.
06.2025
1 Speeches
The cooperation style is consensual and inclusive, emphasizing successful collaboration with the Ministries of Justice, Finance, and Defence, as well as with stakeholders. All substantive proposals from the ministries received consensual support within the commission, which demonstrates openness to compromise and the pursuit of broad-based support.
05.2025
1 Speeches
The style of cooperation is highly consensual, repeatedly emphasizing that all important committee decisions (placing items on the agenda, concluding the reading, and appointing a representative) were made unanimously. They also collaborate with the Minister of Justice and Digital Affairs, Liisa-Ly Pakosta, whose report they support.
04.2025
2 Speeches
The style of cooperation is consensus-based and procedure-centered, emphasizing the unanimity of the commission members in supporting the proposal. The speaker acknowledges and integrates the remarks presented by the Chancellor of Justice, demonstrating a willingness to cooperate with legal bodies. The replacement of the commission representative (from Terras to Suslov) is also mentioned, which indicates internal procedural agreements.
03.2025
16 Speeches
The style of cooperation is committee-centered, emphasizing consensus in certain decisions (such as appointing the rapporteur and placing the draft legislation on the agenda). The speaker clearly presents the voting results and names the six committee members who supported the motion to reject the bill (including Kalle Laanet, Timo Suslov, and Hendrik Johannes Terras). This demonstrates a readiness to work toward the majority position of the committee, even if one's personal opinion may differ.