By Months: Timo Suslov

The political focus is directed toward constitutional procedures and the administration of the judiciary, particularly the process for confirming the Supreme Court Justice nominee. He/She strongly supports the committee’s consensus decisions regarding the inclusion of the bill on the agenda and the final vote. His/Her approach is fact-based and centers on adherence to parliamentary rules of procedure. The political position is procedural rather than values-based.

The political stance is heavily geared toward accelerating regulations and speeding up the completion of planning processes in order to improve the economic climate. The focus is on outcome-based policy, emphasizing that rapid procedures will attract investments and new businesses. The speaker supports these changes, calling them "very good," but requires a clear quantification of their economic impact.

The political position is strongly focused on reducing bureaucracy and supporting entrepreneurs, particularly the defense industry, while emphasizing the need for the state to act more quickly and flexibly. The stance is clearly policy-driven, concentrating on improving legislative processes and strengthening the protection of state secrets. The platform also supports raising state fees and simplifying public procurement.

The speaker strongly supports the draft bill, which aims to reduce bureaucracy and enhance the competitiveness of Estonian businesses. The political focus is results-oriented, stressing the need to accelerate and streamline processes for obtaining business permits. His position is clearly supportive of the policy and geared toward boosting economic efficiency.

The political focus is directed toward the work processes and procedural decisions of the Constitutional Committee, particularly in the context of the draft motor vehicle tax law. The speaker relays the committee's consensus decision to support the proposal that was under discussion. Furthermore, the need is recognized to address the concern raised by the Chancellor of Justice regarding the potential legal inconsistency affecting people with disabilities and large families.

The political position is focused on the Riigikogu's rules of procedure and the submission of a proposal for the rejection of a draft bill concerning the amendment of the Rules of Procedure and Internal Rules Act. The rejection of the bill was supported by the stance that the existing conditions for holding ministers accountable (including a vote of no confidence) are sufficient. The application of monetary coercive measures is considered an ideological question, which indicates moderate opposition to the establishment of new punitive measures.