By Agendas: Timo Suslov

The rhetorical style is polite and constructive, addressing the minister directly in the form of a question. The speech is logical and data-driven, focusing on the details of the policy and demanding more precise figures regarding the economic impact, in order to bring that side "a little bit more into the picture."

The rhetorical style is formal, neutral, and fact-based, typical of the introduction of a draft law and the summary of committee work. The speaker focuses on conveying logical and procedural information, listing the involved parties and the substance of the proposed amendments. Emotional or persuasive appeals are absent.

The style of address is formal, neutral, and procedural, making it suitable for presenting a summary of a committee meeting. The emphasis is on logical and fact-based reporting, focusing on the concise conveyance of consensus decisions and the discussion. Emotional appeals are not utilized, and the presentation is brief and strictly limited in scope.

The speaker's style is formal, neutral, and strictly informative, typical of a commission report. They employ a logical appeal, focusing on the precise detailing of procedural steps, dates, and decisions (e.g., "on March 11," "procedural decisions").

The style is formal, neutral, and procedural, as the speaker strictly adheres to the role of the commission's rapporteur. He/She employs logical appeals, focusing on facts, the commission's decisions, and the length of the debate, which stemmed from ideological questions. The speaker consistently avoids expressing personal opinions, stating that they will do so later, when the opportunity arises.

The rhetorical style is formal, neutral, and concise, characteristic of the rapporteur for the leading committee who communicates procedural decisions. The speaker relies on logical arguments and facts, citing government positions, legal precedents, and the committee’s voting results (6 in favor, 3 against). Emotional or personal appeals are not used.

The rhetorical style is formal, neutral, and procedural, as the speaker is acting in the capacity of the rapporteur for the steering committee. He/She focuses on conveying facts and procedural decisions, utilizing logical appeals based on government positions and prior legislative history. Emotional or personal evaluations are not employed.

The style of discourse is formal, neutral, and highly procedural, focusing on the delivery of facts and commission decisions. Short and straightforward language is employed, emphasizing a rapid overview of the discussions while avoiding emotional or rhetorical devices.