By Plenary Sessions: Riina Solman

The political position is strongly oppositional, focusing on the government's inaction regarding security issues (specifically, voting rights for citizens of the aggressor state) and the restriction of economic freedoms (such as the nationalization of the pharmaceutical market). Criticism is directed at the government's priorities, which are dismissed as mere displacement activities and hastily pushed-through draft legislation. The need to protect economic freedom and the private sector is emphasized, alongside warnings against socialist measures. The critique maintains a dual focus: both values-based (protecting religious communities) and results-oriented (the budget and energy prices).

The speaker is in strong opposition to the government's economic policy, sharply criticizing decisions made in haste and the lack of impact assessments, particularly concerning the profit tax. He/She challenges the government's narrative that opposing tax increases is anti-security or amounts to supporting Kremlin talking points. The political focus is directed toward criticizing the inefficiency of the government's actions and the consequences of the economic downturn.

The speaker is a prominent opposition figure (Isamaa faction) who sharply criticizes the government's fiscal and social policies, particularly the cascading tax increases and cuts made at the expense of vulnerable demographics (pensioners in care homes, mothers raising children at home). The political stance is value-driven, stressing the importance of public health and respecting the elderly, though necessary initiatives such as mental health reform are supported. The speaker characterizes the government's actions as a clear example of broken promises and outright neglect.

The political position is strongly oppositional, focusing on criticizing the government’s process-driven and budget-based approach to social policy. The speaker emphasizes the interests of the nation-state and the small nation, and accuses the government of breaking promises made to families with children. The main issues are demography, family benefits, and the lack of transparency regarding state budget cuts.

The political stance is strongly value-driven and well-considered, focusing on the protection and safety of children. The speaker firmly opposes the adoption of the bill if it leaves open the possibility that pedophiles could be employed in children's institutions. This position is aimed at correcting procedural errors and demands clarity before moving forward.

The political position is strongly opposed to Kaja Kallas’s government’s population policy, especially regarding the abolition of the institution of the Minister of Population. The most critical issue is the birth rate crisis, which is treated as a value-based and vital question concerning the survival of the state. The government’s actions are criticized for breaking promises and reducing the sense of security for families, and proactive engagement is demanded.