By Plenary Sessions: Riina Solman

Insufficient data.

Critical of the government's austerity measures and tax increases, which are seen as reneging on promises and implemented without proper analysis, thereby harming the most vulnerable segments of society. It is emphasized that the predictability of the legal framework is a prerequisite for a competitive business environment.

The speaker emphasizes fiscal responsibility and concern regarding the state's financial difficulties, which they assess as being both alleged and actual. They advocate for minimizing administrative costs and question the expediency of hiring new officials to monitor bureaucracy.

The economic views focus on criticizing the administrative burden placed on employers and government agencies in the form of new control obligations. He/She anxiously notes the low teacher salaries and the need for education managers to rapidly hire people without the necessary qualifications, which points to criticism regarding public sector personnel policy and resource allocation.

Insufficient Data

Economic perspectives emphasize state investment in families and the valuation of parenthood as a long-term economic commitment. The speaker notes that large families (14% of all families) will bear the responsibility for paying pensions in the future to those who choose a career path, and are therefore opposed to cutting family benefits. Raising these benefits is viewed as an economic lever that encourages higher birth rates.

Economic views focus on the efficiency of social spending, supporting targeted state investments in family benefits that have yielded measurable results in birth rates. Caution is expressed regarding the hidden costs associated with the draft legislation, demanding clarity on the communication expenses related to the implementation of the protocol.

Insufficient data.

Economic perspectives focus on the financial accountability and transparency of state-owned enterprises. There is a demand for finance ministers to be held responsible for the financial losses incurred at Eesti Energia stemming from derivative transactions. Criticism is directed at the situation where executives face the threat of criminal investigation while ministers manage to evade responsibility.

The economic viewpoints are indirectly apparent, criticizing the increase in administrative burden placed on employers by the draft bill, as they must now take sole responsibility for control mechanisms. Furthermore, the text points to personnel problems and low wages within educational institutions, which necessitates hurried recruitment and consequently increases security risks.