By Plenary Sessions: Riina Solman

Collaboration with Henn Põlluaas was mentioned in relation to his recent visit to Israel, suggesting cooperation with a colleague who shares the same political spectrum. However, other details concerning broad-based cooperation or a willingness to compromise are absent.

The speaker acknowledges the minister for remaining in the chamber, but their communication is predominantly critical and demanding, expecting the government to provide answers to practical concerns. There is no information regarding cooperation or the seeking of compromises with other political forces.

There isn't enough data.

The speaker is acting on behalf of his party (Isamaa), submitting collective amendments which were ultimately rejected due to the coalition's majority vote. He stresses the necessity of involving competent judicial bodies (the Prosecutor's Office, the justice system) in risk assessment, rather than the Social Insurance Board, citing their superior expertise (know-how).

The speaker clearly supports the Isamaa party’s proposal to amend the constitution, which relates exclusively to the voting rights of Estonian citizens. He/She seeks common ground with the minister on supporting the principle of constitutionality, even while sharply criticizing the current substance of the draft bill.

The speaker emphasized Isamaa’s role in increasing family benefits and drafting legislation, referencing his party’s successful cooperation in the past. He noted that the current minister has engaged in dialogue with the opposition, but criticized the minister for elevating the issue to the level of ideology rather than focusing on solving the actual problem. The willingness to cooperate is conditional and centered on achieving specific outcomes.

The individual operates cooperatively within the Social Affairs Committee, presenting a consensus decision (6:1) to support the protocol on children's rights and detailing the questions raised by other committee members. They refer to Isamaa's support for the ratification of the protocol. During the plenary session, they are forthright when posing questions, demanding practical explanations and words of encouragement regarding demography from the minister and the rapporteur.

Insufficient data.

Insufficient data. The speaker focuses on criticizing the government and demanding accountability, rather than cooperation.

The speaker thanks Madis Timpson, the representative of the coalition party, for discontinuing the bill’s earlier proceedings, and also thanks colleagues on the Social Affairs Committee. At the same time, he emphasizes that since Isamaa’s proposed amendments fell on "deaf ears," cooperation on the final text of the draft bill is not possible. He demands the discontinuation of the bill’s proceedings to ensure the safety of children.