By Plenary Sessions: Priit Sibul

The political stance is moderately critical and policy-driven, focusing intensely on the precision and practical applicability of the legislation. The speaker demands clear definitions regarding exceptions to noise target values when planning residential developments, criticizing ambiguous terms such as "nearby land area." The position aims to improve the quality of the draft bill.

The political stance strongly focuses on systemic healthcare issues, stressing the necessity of improving health equity and broadening health insurance coverage. The speaker is seeking clarity from the minister regarding the most critical concerns in the health sector and long-term priorities. This position is policy-driven, concentrating on the system's sustainability and reducing disparities in access.

The political focus is on the transparency of funding for nationally important cultural objects and parliamentary oversight. The speaker strongly opposes the amendment that delegates the inclusion of objects to the Minister and the Council of the Cultural Endowment, considering it an unreasonable "side door" and a legal thicket. The position is strongly procedure-based, emphasizing adherence to the will of the parliament and the sensible use of taxpayer money.

The political stance is highly critical of the Ministry of Education and Research's performance and capacity, particularly concerning the school network reform and the lack of adequate resources. The criticism centers on the inefficiency and inequity of specific policies—namely, the per-capita funding model and the learning obligation—demanding practical, funded solutions rather than mere "rhetoric" or "exchanging words." The speaker emphasizes the importance of valuing the Estonian education system, cautioning against "throwing the baby out with the bathwater" during the reform process.