By Plenary Sessions: Priit Sibul

The speaker demonstrates knowledge of the technical details of environmental planning and construction law, referencing a specific provision (subsection 22) and terms such as "noise target value." This expertise is aimed at ensuring the terminological accuracy of the draft legislation and assessing its impact on building elements, such as balconies and terraces. Questions are also raised regarding the origin of the cited conventions (e.g., the 300-meter limit), indicating detailed preparation.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in the field of healthcare policy, utilizing specific terminology such as the "population health development plan" and "health equity metrics." They are aware of the system's systemic shortcomings, including long waiting lists for treatment, a shortage of healthcare professionals, and insufficient health insurance coverage. The role and potential of private health insurance is also raised as a separate issue.

The speaker demonstrates profound expertise regarding the financing of nationally important cultural objects and amendments to the Cultural Endowment Act. They are highly familiar with both parliamentary procedural rules and the financing history and budget-strategic context of specific projects (e.g., the ERR TV building, film studios/campuses). They employ precise terminology such as "interpellation," "written question," and "transitional fund monies."

The speaker demonstrates profound expertise in the field of education policy, thoroughly addressing issues related to the per-capita funding model, school network planning, and the socio-economic causes of student dropout. Specific terminology is employed (per-capita funding model, compulsory education, state secondary schools, internal evaluation), and examples of unsuccessful implementation are provided (additional payments in Ida-Viru County, the Põlva school network). The expertise highlights the necessity for more personalized, "tailor-made solutions" rather than a centralized approach.