By Plenary Sessions: Priit Sibul

The primary legislative focus is the swift handling of the comprehensive national defense bill, which seeks to rectify the procedural errors found in the previous draft. The speaker is currently acting as both a demanding party and a critic, awaiting the arrival of the comprehensive bill—as promised by the government—in the Riigikogu (Parliament).

The main legislative priority is the streamlining of the Public Information Act and the improvement of its implementation practices. The speaker has taken the initiative to pose questions to ascertain the progress of the draft bill's preparation.

The focus is on monitoring the implementation of government policy and the budget, particularly concerning the financing of innovation and development activities. Attention is also being paid to the targeted use of the transition fund resources, to ensure the preservation and growth of development activities.

The main legislative focus is on the need to update the Public Information Act, which the speaker considers outdated and in need of modernization. He/She calls for amendments to the legislation or a rapid improvement in administrative practice to prevent the unjustified classification of documents. The speaker supports the Ministry of Justice’s initiative aimed at resolving this problem.

The legislative focus centers on the oversight of government decisions and their conformity to existing financial documentation (the budget strategy). A priority is establishing procedural clarity and defining the level at which decisions are made.

The legislative focus is currently on clarifying and rectifying the consequences arising from existing legislation. The objective is to determine whether the requirement for DNA testing following a birth within the family context was the original intent of the legislature, and to resolve this legal issue that is causing inconvenience for families.

The main legislative focus is on scrutinizing the reliability and execution of the State Budget Strategy (RES). Separate emphasis is placed on the fate of the car tax, with questions being raised about whether it might be scrapped and replaced by other financial measures. The speaker acts as a strong critic and overseer of the government’s financial plans and legislative bills.

The legislative focus is on the detailed scrutiny of the draft bill amending the Cultural Endowment Act. The speaker is acting as a critical interrogator, seeking clarity regarding the content of the bill and the government's support for specific cultural projects.