By Plenary Sessions: Helir-Valdor Seeder
Total Sessions: 4
Fully Profiled: 4
2025-11-11
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
The speaker demonstrates expertise in security and border issues, citing the practices of neighboring countries (Finland, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland) and specific threats (drones, balloons, Zapad 2025). They are knowledgeable about the legislative process and comment on the structural aspects of the judicial reform. Furthermore, they possess knowledge regarding the specific nuances of international law (e.g., the Kaliningrad precedent) concerning the blocking of borders.
2025-11-05
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding international treaties and the transfer of prisoners, highlighting procedural aspects and the consequences for relations between states. They are also familiar with the ministry's internal working documents, defending the former Minister of Justice by referencing a working paper that was prepared prior to their tenure. Additionally, they show interest in border guard infrastructure, inquiring about the restoration of the Narva border buoys.
2025-11-05
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour
The speaker demonstrates profound expertise regarding the Riigikogu Rules of Procedure Act and general parliamentary procedural rules, specifically focusing on the regulation of supplementary questions during the information session. They employ precise legal terminology (such as 'procedural framework,' 'Rules of Procedure Act,' and 'right to self-governance') and cite an authoritative source—the Supreme Court (Riigikohus)—to substantiate their position. They stress that clearly defining procedural matters ultimately saves time in the long run.
2025-11-03
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The speaker demonstrates expertise in matters concerning the organization and administrative structure of local government, citing examples of specific municipalities (Türi Rural Municipality, Paide City, Narva). He focuses on administrative jurisdiction and workload, questioning whether the proposed change genuinely requires such a high level of competence that centralization becomes necessary. Furthermore, he is well-versed in the legislative process (committee sessions, proposed amendments).