By Plenary Sessions: Helir-Valdor Seeder

The main criticism is aimed at the Government of the Republic and coalition members of parliament, who are accused of lacking political initiative regarding the closure of the control line. The earlier decision to vote down the draft bill is being criticized, and questions are being raised as to why a comprehensive report from security institutions is not available to Riigikogu members. The criticism is focused on policy and procedure, thereby calling the government's competence into question.

The opposition's position is highly intense, criticizing the government for both its irresponsibility and the narrow base of support it relied on to push the draft legislation through. Opponents, meanwhile, are being accused of demagoguery for misrepresenting the former minister's views. The speaker promises to do everything in their power in the future to terminate this agreement as soon as possible.

The primary conflict is with the session chair, who is being intensely criticized for misinterpreting procedural rules and generating needless discussion. The criticism is aimed at a remark made by the chair, which the speaker deemed "irrelevant" and "misleading." The confrontation is purely procedural, not politically substantive.

The opposition is aimed at the proponents of the bill and the committee, criticizing their rationale for centralizing the registration of births. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, focusing on the fact that the arguments presented (workload and competence) are unconvincing. The speaker is actively attempting to alter the content of the bill using the amendment proposed by Isamaa.