By Plenary Sessions: Helir-Valdor Seeder

The focus is heavily on the county level, in opposition to the new artificial and illogical regional areas (referred to as "oblasts"). He stresses the importance of the decision-making authority held by county development centers and local governments, and calls for the finalization of regional sports infrastructure development (specifically, football halls in every county).

The focus is exclusively on the national level, addressing the constitutionality of the state budget and the activities of state oversight bodies. There is no regional focus.

Not enough data

The focus is on national issues, primarily the state budget and supporting public transportation, which is a nationwide topic. There is no specific regional or local focus.

The strong regional focus centers on the financing and autonomy of local municipalities. Criticism is being leveled against the regional minister for forming confusing regions and creating new positions that act as extensions of the central government. Furthermore, the necessity of resolving how local governments cover education expenses is emphasized.

There is no regional focus; attention is centered on national legislation, tax policy, and the interests of those preserving cultural heritage (the owners of historic vehicles) nationwide.

The focus is on national legislation and its impact on the security of the Republic of Estonia. It mentions the international context concerning loyalty and dual citizenship (specifically citizens of aggressor states, such as Russia and Belarus). There is no local or regional focus.

The regional focus is limited, highlighting the example of the city of Viljandi in the context of the failure to take over the adult gymnasium, to illustrate the ministry's inaction. The remaining topics (taxation, national defense, education law) are national.

No data available