By Plenary Sessions: Helir-Valdor Seeder

The political stance is heavily focused on national security and legal propriety, demanding the disenfranchisement of citizens and stateless persons originating from the aggressor state in local elections. Sharp opposition is also voiced against the continuous and irrational restructuring of the government apparatus, which is labeled as the "kolkhoz house mentality." These positions are strongly value-based, highlighting the failure of the integration expectations set in 1992 and stressing the necessity of correcting this historical error. The speaker views the coalition as being held hostage by the social democrats, who are obstructing decisions that align with the state's security interests.

The political position is strongly aimed at revoking the voting rights of Russian citizens and stateless persons in local elections, viewing this as a threat to Estonian security. It criticizes the government coalition for delaying action and submitting to the dictates of the Social Democrats on this issue. The speaker's stance is value-based, emphasizing national security and the failure of integration.

The political stance is strongly opposed to the government's tax policy and its legislative culture. It is stressed that the government engages in poor legislative practices, disregarding the principles of good governance and acting without a mandate from the electorate, particularly regarding the sharp increase in land tax. The position is mainly procedural and outcome-based, focusing on restoring trust between the state and its citizens.

The speaker's stance is strongly oppositional, focusing on sharp criticism of the government's budget policy and the procedural rules of the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament). He highlights the three-year contraction of the economy and deems the budget procedure an "absurd theatre" and a "brutal violation of the Rules of Procedure and Internal Rules Act." The political framework is highly procedural and demands strict fiscal discipline, representing the positions of the Isamaa faction.

The most important issue is the strong opposition to the ministry's plan to create four artificial regional cooperation areas, which have been dubbed "substitute activity" and "a bogeyman." The speaker strongly advocates basing regional policy on existing counties, municipal boundaries, and local identity. The political framework is heavily administrative and value-based, emphasizing a common-sense approach.