By Plenary Sessions: Helir-Valdor Seeder
Total Sessions: 97
Fully Profiled: 97
2025-10-15
The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
The speaker moderately supports cosmetic changes to the deadlines for submitting presidential candidates, but takes a strong principled position regarding the restoration of the proportional composition of the Electoral College. He emphasizes the need to restore the original intent of the constitutional drafters, which would favor local governments with smaller populations. In one speech, the necessity of the institution of the presidency itself is also raised, referencing the ideas put forth by Siim Kallas. The political framework is strongly focused on the principles of constitutionality and statesmanship.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The political stance is strongly opposed to the government's tax policy, focusing specifically on criticizing the hikes in car tax, income tax, and VAT. The primary focus is on the government's breach of its mandate and its pre-election promises ("Read my lips, taxes will not rise!"). The speaker questions the government's right to implement such sweeping tax increases, highlighting the contradiction between political actions and stated promises.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour
The political position is strongly opposed to the government's fiscal and tax policies, focusing specifically on the 2026 state budget, which is viewed as fueling inflation and increasing the national debt burden. The speaker sharply criticizes the use of borrowed money to fulfill a "stupid election promise," and dismisses new taxes planned for the future (RES/motor fuel tax) as a deception. The stance is outcome-oriented, warning of economic catastrophe and the impoverishment of the populace.
2025-10-06
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The political position is strongly opposed to the car tax, deeming it unreasonable, unjust, and bureaucratic. This stance is value-based and policy-focused, emphasizing the necessity of promoting motorization in rural areas as the most cost-effective transport solution for the state. Criticism is also directed at the coalition partners for violating their pre-election promises.
2025-09-24
15th Estonian Parliament, 6th sitting, press briefing
The political stance is strongly anti-government, focusing on unanalyzed EU climate targets that harm the economy, as well as the state's financial disarray. The speaker sharply criticizes the incompetence and unconstitutionality of the budget drafting process, emphasizing economic competitiveness and responsible governance. These positions are heavily policy- and results-driven, labeling the government's choices as "stupid and harmful."
2025-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.
The most crucial issue is national security, which is tied to reducing the geopolitical influence of the Moscow Patriarchate in Estonia. The speaker strongly supports the adoption of the bill, stressing that this is necessary to prevent the spread of the ideology of Russian aggression. The political stance is value-based, prioritizing national security interests over considerations of "technical rule of law."
2025-09-17
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, press briefing.
The political focus centers on the unwavering support for the transition to Estonian-language education, demanding government oversight and pressuring local authorities to prevent any reversal of the process. The individual emphasizes that there is no alternative to moving to Estonian-language instruction. Furthermore, they raise the question of whether the state can guarantee the necessary resources and teachers to meet its statutory obligation to provide mother tongue and cultural instruction for Ukrainian refugees. The political framework is clearly oriented toward policy implementation and core values.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The political position is strongly critical of the previous minister's actions in the social affairs and healthcare sector, highlighting poor management (the Health Insurance Fund deficit, unjustified bonuses) and non-evidence-based policy (the reversal of family benefits). A pointed question is raised regarding the ruling party's internal contradictions and political continuity. The focus is primarily on the effectiveness and accountability of the government’s actions.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, press briefing
The political focus is currently directed at the organization of parliamentary work and the procedures for submitting questions during the information hour. The speaker moderately disagrees with the position that the precise phrasing of a question dictates the quality of the response, drawing on their extensive experience. They stress the necessity of procedural flexibility to address a broad spectrum of issues ("Varia").
2025-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session.
The political stance is strongly opposed to Draft Bill 671, initiated by the government, which essentially mandates the liquidation or forced reorganization of credit unions. The speaker emphasizes the necessity of preserving this form of business enterprise, viewing the government’s action as a disproportionate restriction on entrepreneurial freedom and contrary to the spirit of the constitution. This position is rooted in policy and values, demanding the rejection of the draft bill and a focus instead on strengthening regulatory oversight.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The political stance is one of strong opposition, centered on defending the procedural rules of the Riigikogu (Parliament) and the principles of the rule of law against the "arbitrary actions" of the government and its leadership. Emphasis is placed on the alignment of Isamaa's views with the interests of the Estonian people and state, prioritizing criticism of internal security (specifically, the voting rights of Russian citizens) and the government's tax policy (the car tax). The political framework is robustly value-based (rule of law) and results-oriented (focusing on the ineffectiveness and unlawfulness of the government's activities).
2025-06-16
XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting
The political focus is heavily directed against the government’s proposed waste sorting system, which is widely considered archaic and inefficient. Instead, there is strong support for technology-based, mechanized sorting, which is demonstrably more effective, cheaper, and environmentally sustainable. Furthermore, the issue of linking the import of waste and prisoners to the quality of domestic waste is being raised, thereby connecting this policy debate to broader European issues.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker firmly opposes the perpetuation of tax increases and vigorously defends the opposition's right to submit amendments that contradict the bill's objective. He emphasizes the parliament's good faith in adhering to the constitution and deems necessary the adoption of legislation rooted in security considerations and the assurance of internal peace. The political position is conservative, warning against campaign-driven trends and experiments originating in Europe (e.g., the immigration craze, the green transition).
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker firmly advocates for a long-term strategic national defense policy, stressing the enduring nature of the threat posed by the eastern neighbor and criticizing previous short-sighted decisions (e.g., acceding to the 2004 convention). Domestically, he/she strongly supports reforming the system for supervising party financing, deeming the activities of the ERJK (Party Financing Supervision Committee) unsystematic and unfair. The political framework is strongly value-based and critical of the government's actions concerning both security and fiscal policy.
2025-06-02
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
The political focus is currently centered on the precision of state budget planning and the effectiveness of the government's financial management. The speaker criticized the Ministry of Finance for inaccurate cost forecasting, particularly concerning energy expenditures, raising the question of why other ministries failed to achieve similar savings. This stance is results-oriented and emphasizes oversight of government operations.
2025-05-21
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The speaker holds a strongly oppositional stance, focusing on two main themes: opposition to the tax burden and the emphasis on the long-term perspective of security issues. He sharply criticizes the government’s economic policy and tax hikes, demanding a reduction in the tax burden for both private citizens and businesses. Regarding security matters, he stresses foresight and deems the accession to the 2004 convention a short-sighted error, supporting its annulment.
2025-05-19
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The political position heavily emphasizes the stability of agricultural policy and rural development, calling for a strategic approach. The most pressing demand is the need for legislation protecting fertile agricultural land, which is viewed as a strategically vital issue because it is a non-renewable natural resource. Criticism is aimed at the government's structural instability and the absence of a substantive response, underscoring the necessity of a policy-based framework.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The political focus is heavily centered on national security, supporting the adoption of a bill deemed essential for Estonia's security and consistent with the constitution. The speaker adopts an oppositional stance, demanding clarity from the coalition regarding the 20% budget cuts and criticizing colleagues who have, seemingly overnight, acquired a surprisingly strong faith in the president's authority. Their framework is primarily policy- and value-based (security) and procedural (constitutionality).
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.
The speaker strongly emphasizes the crucial role played by professional civil servants and contrasts this with the government’s purely rhetorical approach to reducing bureaucracy and implementing cuts. The political focus is on holding the ruling coalition (the Reform Party and Eesti 200) accountable for both the vague budget cuts and the offensive domestic rhetoric. He/She heavily criticizes the government’s actions, viewing them as slogan-driven rather than substantive.
2025-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The most prominent issue is the procedural correctness of the Riigikogu session and the minister's obligation to be physically present during the debate on their report. The speaker is strongly opposed to the minister participating remotely, deeming it precedent-setting and inappropriate, as it diminishes the minister's actual involvement and accountability. The focus is clearly on institutional functionality and ensuring accountability.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political position heavily focuses on accountability and suspicions of political favoritism, specifically linking Mart Võrklaev's potential appointment to the Bank of Estonia with a reward received for implementing the car tax. This approach is outcome-oriented, challenging the motives behind the government's actions and demanding direct confirmation or denial. The speaker is critical of the transparency surrounding the government's decisions.
2025-04-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The political stance is strongly defensive for Isamaa, responding to what is considered unwarranted criticism from its coalition partners (the Social Democrats, Estonia 200, and the Reform Party). The key political priority is energy policy, specifically supporting the implementation of a fixed price cap for the universal service to guarantee consumers always receive the most favorable price. The focus is policy- and results-driven, centered on rectifying past decisions.
2025-04-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The most prominent theme is energy policy and energy security. The speaker expresses moderate skepticism regarding the government's forecasts, asking in detail how the energy supply will be guaranteed by local production during periods of low wind and sun. The focus is on results-based monitoring of policy implementation and planning.
2025-04-09
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
A strong oppositional stance, centered on the contradictory nature and incompetence of the government’s policies in managing the economic crisis. Key themes include fiscal policy, tax reductions (including VAT on groceries), and social policy (pensions, teachers’ salaries). The criticism is primarily performance-based, highlighting the inefficiency of the government’s actions and the increase in spending rather than necessary cuts.
2025-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The political position is strongly opposed to the government's car tax and unsatisfactory public transport policy, emphasizing that this taxation constitutes a punishment. Furthermore, the importance of adhering to the Riigikogu's rules of procedure and good practice has been highlighted, criticizing the processing of the draft bill in the absence of its initiator. The viewpoint is primarily based on values (freedom, justice) and results (the inefficiency of public transport).
2025-03-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Insufficient data
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The most crucial issue is amending the constitution to restrict voting rights in local elections exclusively to Estonian citizens, a necessity driven by the changed security environment. The speaker strongly backs this change, stressing that the right to form political power must reside with the constitutional authority, and that this is not simply a matter of local governance. They criticize the parliament's previous inaction and the time wasted in addressing this vital security aspect. Although the compromise proposal is viewed as imperfect from a security perspective, it is being supported for the sake of achieving broad consensus.
2025-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing.
The political focus is sharply centered on boosting the tangible capabilities of national defense, stressing that the enemy fears actual capacity, not mere percentages. The speaker criticizes the government's performance, demanding concrete measures to expand the wartime structure, properly equip the territorial defense, and halt the exodus of active duty personnel. This stance is heavily policy- and results-driven, requiring meaningful, substantive action regarding the management of national defense.
2025-03-12
The 15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.
The political position is fiercely opposed to the previous government’s "drastic left turn" and the "tax war waged against its own people." The speaker urgently demands the reversal of bureaucratic initiatives (such as dividing Estonia into four oblasts) and emphasizes the need to boost state efficiency and slash governance costs. The stance is strongly policy- and results-based, centering on the negative impact of the government’s actions.
2025-03-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political position is strongly opposed to the government's performance, emphasizing that the current administration has sown "confusion, disorder, and chaos" in Estonia. The rhetoric is forceful and focuses on the government's failures, linking them even to the long-term development strategy leading up to 2035.
2025-02-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political position is strongly value-based, focusing on national security and the clarity of the constitution. The speaker firmly supports leaving the right to vote only to Estonian citizens, sharply opposing proposals that would perpetuate the voting rights of persons with undetermined citizenship or create complex categories of allies. He/She emphasizes that the amendment is necessary due to the current exceptional security situation and that the constitutional change must be finalized now to prevent the prolongation of social tensions.
2025-02-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The political stance is strongly oppositional, focusing on both the procedural and substantive flaws in the government's reforms (covering education, energy, and regional administration). Emphasis is placed on the lack of comprehensive planning and the tendency to make decisions within a narrow circle, which is detrimental to rural regions and national security. The speaker criticizes the government for its unfair tax policy (specifically the car tax) and poor regional policy, arguing that these measures are designed to penalize people living in the countryside. The overall critique targets deficiencies in both policy formulation and practical performance.
2025-02-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary meeting
The speaker strongly supports Bill 544, submitted by Isamaa, which proposes amendments to the Local Government Council Election Act. This bill is technical in nature and necessitated by the need to amend the constitution. The speaker stresses the necessity of processing the draft legislation concurrently to ensure legal clarity and efficient use of time. In a second address, the speaker adopted a sharply critical position regarding the fundamentals of the governing coalition's energy policy, labeling them as unstable and unreliable.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
A strong and broad-based opposition to the government, focusing on the poor quality of the government's governance and the lack of trust shown toward parliament and society. The sharpest points of contention concern the amendment of the constitution (the issue of suffrage) and unfair tax policy (the car tax). The stance is clearly results-oriented and values-driven, demanding a vote of no confidence in the government and the formation of a new coalition. The political framework is crisis-centric, pointing to "disorder" in all sectors.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
The speaker vigorously opposes the government's strategic energy policy decisions, deeming them detrimental to the state and lacking transparency, particularly regarding the allocation of billions of euros in taxpayer funds. He categorically rejects the Prime Minister's accusation that the Isamaa party intends to dismantle the constitutional order, demanding an adequate response to this and the notification of security agencies. The political framework is heavily procedural and results-oriented, focusing on the government's incompetence and the disregard for the role of parliament.
2025-01-29
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th sitting, information briefing
The speaker heavily focuses on criticizing the government's performance and administrative capacity, emphasizing the prevailing state of "disarray" in the country due to the lack of clarity regarding ministerial responsibilities. The main political stance involves supporting robust consumer protection, opposing hidden price hikes and the unilateral alteration of contract terms. The political framework is primarily results-based and centers on demanding action from supervisory authorities.
2025-01-22
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.
The political focus is directed towards ensuring the Riigikogu's rules of procedure and procedural fairness. The speaker strongly contests the session chair's interpretation regarding the right to reply, emphasizing the equal rights of individual members, including those who are non-affiliated. The position taken is strongly value-based, centered on the correct adherence to previous practice and the law.
2025-01-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The most crucial issue is the demographic crisis, which is being described as a "catastrophe" and the number one problem facing the Estonian state, surpassing both security and the economy in importance. The political position is strongly opposed to the government’s austerity and tax policies, which are being implemented at the expense of family policy, including cuts to parental benefits and support for large families. The stance is both value-based (the survival of the nation) and performance-based (criticizing specific policies).
2024-12-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing
The speaker strongly opposes the government’s regional policy, particularly the proposed creation of four "oblasts," which he labels as centralization and "stupidity squared." He firmly supports state funding for grassroots sports organizations (Jõud, School Sports Association) and demands the completion of the regional football hall project in every county, a project initiated under the previous coalition agreement. His political framework is heavily focused on reducing bureaucracy and preserving regional autonomy in decision-making.
2024-12-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The political position is strongly critical of the current state budget and the process by which it was handled, emphasizing that due to its lack of transparency, the budget is potentially unconstitutional. This stance is procedural and outcome-based, focusing on the legality and clarity of the state's finances. The speaker also questions why the president failed to return the budget, citing systemic irregularities.
2024-12-12
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The most prominent theme is defining the populist nature of the draft legislation. The stance is scrutinizing and cautious regarding potential populism, whether left- or right-wing, which points to a value-based approach to the quality of lawmaking.
2024-12-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The political position is one of strong opposition to the government's fiscal policy, particularly the tax hikes that have been raised to record levels without the budget having any clear objective. The speaker vigorously defends the rights of the opposition and criticizes the handling of the draft bill as unjust, citing violations of the Rules of Procedure Act. The criticism is primarily aimed at the government's actions and performance (its performance-driven approach).
2024-12-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth session, press briefing.
The political stance is sharply critical of the government’s actions, accusing it of substituting necessary decisions with unnecessary bureaucracy and mere busywork. The strongest objections are raised against the vague content of the education pact and regional agreements, as well as the failure to resolve public transport funding. The criticism focuses primarily on the government’s inefficiency and procedural shortcomings. Furthermore, the wording of the coalition’s draft constitutional amendment concerning suffrage is also opposed.
2024-12-10
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The political stance is sharply critical of the government (specifically Kristen Michal’s cabinet), particularly concerning its tax policy, faulting it for the confusion and inconsistency between promising "tax peace" and the subsequent introduction of new levies (the security tax). The speaker demands clarity in legislation and advocates for protecting those who preserve cultural heritage (restorers of vintage vehicles) from unreasonable annual taxes. The position is strongly procedural and policy-driven, emphasizing the necessity of laws for regulating conflicting situations.
2024-12-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session.
A strong, value-based opposition to the government's practice of granting citizenship to individuals repeatedly convicted of intentional crimes. It emphasizes that citizenship is a privilege, not an inherent human right, and that loyalty and national security must be paramount when it is conferred. The political framework is conservative and state-centric, criticizing the granting of broad discretion to officials and the government.
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speaker is a prominent opposition politician who concentrates on government accountability, fiscal transparency, and strict adherence to legislative procedures. He opposes the proposed broad-based tax hike (the so-called security tax) and insists on the targeted allocation of defense spending. His political focus is heavily aimed at violations of the Rules of Procedure and Internal Rules, as well as education policy issues (specifically, the Estonian-language environment), framing his arguments through a legal and value-based lens.
2024-12-03
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speaker's political stance is strictly procedural, focusing on advancing the legislative process during the plenary session of the Riigikogu. This position is manifested in a consistent demand to put the proposed amendments to a vote. Specific political preferences or a value-based framework are not evident from the speeches.
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The political stance is heavily focused on national security and legal propriety, demanding the disenfranchisement of citizens and stateless persons originating from the aggressor state in local elections. Sharp opposition is also voiced against the continuous and irrational restructuring of the government apparatus, which is labeled as the "kolkhoz house mentality." These positions are strongly value-based, highlighting the failure of the integration expectations set in 1992 and stressing the necessity of correcting this historical error. The speaker views the coalition as being held hostage by the social democrats, who are obstructing decisions that align with the state's security interests.
2024-11-20
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing.
The political position is strongly aimed at revoking the voting rights of Russian citizens and stateless persons in local elections, viewing this as a threat to Estonian security. It criticizes the government coalition for delaying action and submitting to the dictates of the Social Democrats on this issue. The speaker's stance is value-based, emphasizing national security and the failure of integration.
2024-11-18
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth Session, Plenary Session
The political stance is strongly opposed to the government's tax policy and its legislative culture. It is stressed that the government engages in poor legislative practices, disregarding the principles of good governance and acting without a mandate from the electorate, particularly regarding the sharp increase in land tax. The position is mainly procedural and outcome-based, focusing on restoring trust between the state and its citizens.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.
The speaker's stance is strongly oppositional, focusing on sharp criticism of the government's budget policy and the procedural rules of the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament). He highlights the three-year contraction of the economy and deems the budget procedure an "absurd theatre" and a "brutal violation of the Rules of Procedure and Internal Rules Act." The political framework is highly procedural and demands strict fiscal discipline, representing the positions of the Isamaa faction.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
The most important issue is the strong opposition to the ministry's plan to create four artificial regional cooperation areas, which have been dubbed "substitute activity" and "a bogeyman." The speaker strongly advocates basing regional policy on existing counties, municipal boundaries, and local identity. The political framework is heavily administrative and value-based, emphasizing a common-sense approach.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The political platform places a strong emphasis on national security, demanding the immediate restriction of voting rights for citizens of the aggressor state, arguing that this poses a significant threat. It also supports the universal application of security requirements and restrictions to all organizations operating in Estonia (churches, businesses, NGOs). Furthermore, it vigorously defends the constitutional role of the Riigikogu in processing the state budget, while criticizing any opposing viewpoints.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
The political focus is on restricting the voting rights of citizens of the aggressor state in local elections, while simultaneously highlighting the potential inclusion of allied citizens based on reciprocal agreements. The speaker’s position is firmly geared toward refuting misinformation and defending the precise content of the draft bill initiated by Isamaa, which is deeply rooted in values and driven by security concerns. He/She emphasizes that this is a critically important issue.
2024-10-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The political position is strongly opposed to the government’s budgetary methodology, emphasizing the lack of transparency in concealing public transport subsidies and cuts. The speaker supports implementing an earmarked and temporary security tax to boost public confidence and prevent accusations of using the funds to cover budget deficits. The focus is on procedural integrity and building trust.
2024-10-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing
The political stance is heavily focused on internal security and national identity, accusing the minister and the Social Democrats of posing a direct threat to the Estonian state. The most critical issues include revoking the voting rights of Russian and Belarusian citizens, enforcing the transition to Estonian-language education, and opposing any multiplication of the immigration quota. This position is value-based and centers on criticizing the government's inaction and resistance. The political framework is constructed to demonstrate a systemic pattern wherein the opposing side has consistently undermined national interests.
2024-10-15
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The political focus centers on the internal organization and procedural flexibility of the parliament, stressing the necessity of being "boldly creative and flexible" and having extensive self-management capabilities. The speaker's stance is strongly geared toward ensuring that the rules of procedure do not impede the parliament's working momentum. This position is clearly focused on procedure and effectiveness.
2024-10-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
Politically, the speaker is a strong opponent of the government-initiated reorganization of ministries, viewing it as ineffective, fragmented, and tailored to the interests of a single individual. He supports universal benefits in the social sector and sharply criticizes the government’s tax hikes and the reduction of family benefits, which harms large families. The criticism targets both the government’s competence and the lack of long-term stability in state governance.
2024-10-10
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth sitting, plenary session.
The political position strongly centers on the dignity of parliamentary work and strict adherence to procedural rules, underscoring a value-based approach to lawmaking. The speaker sharply objects to taking a recess during the deliberation of the draft bill for the purpose of consulting with the minister by phone, demanding substantive clarity and the adjournment of the reading. This constitutes strong opposition to procedural practices that are irregular and rushed.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The political stance is strongly oppositional, focusing primarily on streamlining state finances and ensuring regional equity. The speaker vehemently opposes the government’s tax policy, particularly the changes to the income tax system, which, in their estimation, increase instability and create significant budget deficits (half a billion annually). The political framework is heavily geared toward resolving the economic crisis and promoting fiscal responsibility. Furthermore, they highlight issues concerning regional policy and the unequal treatment of local municipalities.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
This political stance heavily emphasizes national security, highlighting the threat posed by granting voting rights to Russian and Belarusian citizens in local and presidential elections. The speaker urgently calls upon the Reform Party-led coalition to take concrete steps to restrict suffrage, citing warnings issued by security agencies. This position is strongly value-driven, prioritizing the defense of the state against voters who support Putin's policies.
2024-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
The political position is strongly focused on adherence to the Riigikogu's rules of procedure and the effective conduct of the session. The speaker firmly supports adjourning the session due to technical problems in order to ensure the rational use of parliamentarians' time, emphasizing a lawful and results-oriented approach.
2024-09-16
The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.
The political stance is heavily focused on the sustainability of the Estonian nation-state and internal security. It stands in opposition to the government's policies, which permit high levels of immigration and allegedly undermine national defense (citing, for example, reductions in the Defence League/Kaitseliit). The speaker demands control over migration and criticizes the government's actions as being contrary to Estonia's vital security interests. The overall framework is strongly value-based and highlights the government's ineffective handling of crisis situations.
2024-09-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The political position focuses heavily on the rapid development of national defense, stressing the critical nature of the situation where Estonia is short on both time and money. The speaker questions the effectiveness of the government’s actions, demanding an explanation as to why accelerated, off-cycle capability development has not been requested from allies. Furthermore, the shortage of Defense League (Kaitseliit) instructors is criticized, despite the massive influx of new members.
2024-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The political position focuses strongly on demanding accountability from the Ministry of Education for the failure of the joint entrance exams at state gymnasiums. The speaker criticizes the government's inability to clearly define and acknowledge this responsibility, stressing that this is an unfair situation affecting the future of young people. The stance is strongly results-oriented, requiring a specific explanation of how this responsibility will be demonstrated.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu extraordinary session.
The political position is strongly focused on security and national defense, demanding clarity regarding the status of Petserimaa and the issues surrounding the Estonian-Russian border treaty. Domestically, the speaker is firmly opposed to retaining the voting rights of Russian and Belarusian citizens in local elections, viewing this as a security matter that necessitates a constitutional amendment. The speaker is critical of the ideological ambiguity and rapid "rebirth" of the government members (SDE).
2024-07-29
The 15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu.
The political position heavily focuses on ensuring the proper organization of the Riigikogu’s work and maintaining procedural integrity. The speaker criticizes the actions of the Presidium, stressing that inconsistent interpretation and application of the law signals the erosion of parliamentary culture. This stance is clearly aimed at standardizing the parliament’s internal rules and is strongly results-oriented (performance-driven).
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The political position is one of strong opposition to the government's tax policy, particularly regarding the car tax and the redistribution of local government revenue bases. Criticism targets both procedural errors (specifically, the unconstitutional linking of bills) and the substantive damage caused, accusing the government of waging a "tax war against its own people" and being mired in a governance crisis. The speaker emphasizes that this tax policy undermines Estonia's regional balance and disproportionately affects the poorer segments of the population.
2024-07-22
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu's extraordinary session.
The political stance is strongly oppositional and results-oriented, focusing on the government’s (Reform Party’s) failures in managing state finances and the ongoing spree of tax hikes. Emphasis is also placed on the weakness of Estonian security in the Baltic region and the disregard for the demographic crisis within the coalition agreement. The speaker demands that the government acknowledge its mistakes in order to arrive at the "correct diagnosis."
2024-07-15
15th Riigikogu, Extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The most prominent issue is the composition and organization of the Riigikogu Board. The speaker strongly supports Urmas Reinsalu’s candidacy, justifying this by the need to protect parliamentary democracy and sound political culture. The stance is strongly value-based and is aimed at improving the work of the current Board, emphasizing Reinsalu’s ability to organize the parliament’s work more effectively.
2024-06-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, additional plenary session
The political position centers on procedural action, underscoring the necessity of voting on the proposed amendments. The speaker’s position is rooted in both policy and values, as they demand a vote and issue a warning, urging their colleagues to consider the consequences of their decisions.
2024-06-12
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.
The political position is firmly opposed to the draft bill, centering on the violation of the principle of legal certainty and the increased taxation of landowners. The focus is placed on the government’s breach of faith, given that the previously established land tax increase schedule is being altered retroactively and on short notice. The political framework is aimed at safeguarding the confidence of citizens and businesses in the state authority.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker adopts a strong opposition stance, focusing on criticizing the government’s tax policy (car tax, increase in state fees) and procedural injustice. The arguments are heavily rooted in values and outcomes, accusing the government of hypocrisy, deceit, and eroding public trust. They demand the suspension of the processing of the draft legislation, citing the violation of the principles of legal certainty and democracy.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The political stance is strongly opposed to the government's actions, which are described as incompetent, dishonest, and deceitful. The main focus is directed at the government breaking its promises (the income tax exemption for pensions, the car tax) and the "brutal cuts" in the social sector. Although the speaker supports making the state more efficient and fiscally responsible, their criticism is primarily aimed at the government's ethical performance and the erosion of public trust.
2024-06-04
15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting
The most prominent issue is the taxation of pensions and the reduction of family benefits, measures the speaker vehemently opposes, labeling them "brutal cuts." This stance is intensely value-driven, highlighting social justice, solidarity, and the erosion of state credibility caused by broken election promises. The speaker expresses serious concern regarding the trust placed in politicians and the state, which, in his view, has suffered a catastrophic decline.
2024-05-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The political stance is one of strong opposition to the proposed amendment to the Land Tax Act, which grants local municipalities complete discretion in setting the tax rate. This opposition is framed in terms of economic damage (amounting to hundreds of millions) and a violation of the principle of legal certainty. The speaker is defending the interests of landowners, businesses, and farmers against the expected manifold increase in the tax burden.
2024-05-28
15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
The political focus is currently centered on the critical state of the nation's finances and budget balance, with accusations leveled against the government for continuing its deceitful policies. The speaker is vehemently opposed to the government's plan to abolish the so-called 'non-existent tax hump,' deeming it unreasonable and detrimental during an economic crisis. The overall framing aims to criticize the government's operational inefficiency and its profound lack of statesmanship. This political position is defined by a strong demand that the government admit its error and immediately halt the legislative process for the bill.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The politician is vehemently opposed to the proposed bill, which seeks to regulate denunciation, emphasizing its negative impact on societal morality and Estonia's historical memory. This position is motivated by both value-based arguments (historical trauma) and practical concerns (the growth of bureaucracy). He stresses that the Estonian state and its people absolutely do not need such legislation in the current climate.
2024-05-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker's primary political position is a strong, value-driven demand to suspend the voting rights of citizens of the Russian Federation and Belarus in local elections, viewing this as a critical national security matter. They criticize the government for lacking the political will necessary to address security concerns, especially given the situation where Russia has declared a "holy war" against the West. This stance is clearly aimed at mitigating security risks and upholding the value of Estonian citizenship.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.
The speaker's political position is strongly oppositional, focusing on criticizing the ruling coalition's procedural breaches (the "violent" bundling of amendments) and issues concerning internal security (the voting rights of third-country nationals). The restriction of voting rights is presented as an essential internal security measure during wartime, emphasizing its existential importance. Furthermore, there is strong opposition to the law enabling anonymous denunciation, which is framed ideologically as the "law destroying social morality."
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The most prominent topic is internal security and the suspension of voting rights for Russian and Belarusian citizens in local elections, a measure that is strongly supported. The government is sharply criticized for failing to deliver the promised sense of security and for lacking political will. This stance is primarily directed against the government's inaction and inefficiency.
2024-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The political position is strongly opposed to the government-initiated draft amendment to the election law, arguing that it fails to address issues of electoral integrity and proportionality and will only erode public trust. Criticism is also leveled at tax policy, stressing that, contrary to the misleading assertions made by the Reform Party representative, the upcoming income tax change will actually increase the tax burden for everyone. The framing of this position is primarily policy-driven and value-based, focusing on constitutional mandates and the principle of electoral uniformity.
2024-05-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The politician's position is strongly opposed to tax increases, particularly the sweet drink tax, which he describes as a "tax war" waged against citizens and businesses. His stance is heavily procedurally driven, emphasizing the lack of good legislative practice and scientific grounding, and asserting that the true objectives are purely financial. Furthermore, he supports a firm political position against Russian influence and the activities of the Moscow Patriarchate in Estonia.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The political position is strongly opposed to the draft election law, particularly the provisions concerning voting via smart devices, emphasizing the risks to public trust and security. This stance is deeply procedural, criticizing the unlawful bundling of amendments and the violation of the fundamental rights of Riigikogu members. The Isamaa faction demands the interruption of the second reading of the bill in order to take expert comments into account and ensure the integrity of the elections. This position is rooted in core values (democratic elections, the rule of law) and adherence to proper procedure.
2024-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The political stance is strongly oppositional, focusing on the demographic crisis and the reduction of benefits for large families. The speaker opposes the government’s policy, which, in their estimation, consciously pits families with one or two children against larger families. This position is framed around core values, emphasizing the sustainability of the Estonian nation-state and the critical necessity of investing in children. The speaker criticizes the government’s actions due to the revocation of promises and the undermining of legal certainty.
2024-04-03
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The political stance is heavily focused on security, stressing the necessity of revoking the voting rights of third-country nationals in local elections, viewing this as a matter of Estonian national security. Simultaneously, it sharply criticizes the government for implementing tax hikes, arguing that tax collection is being prioritized over security. This position is strongly opposed to the government's current activities and is results-driven, highlighting the administration's perceived lack of action.
2024-04-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The political stance is fiercely oppositional, centered on defending the Riigikogu's rules of procedure and constitutional voting requirements, alongside the ideological critique of the government's economic policy. The speaker is convinced that the opposition is correct on procedural matters, even when the coalition uses its majority to vote them down. The framework is dual: procedural (the constitution) and political (the contentious nature of tax increases and spending).
2024-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The political position focuses on strengthening the Riigikogu's role in supporting education funding and teacher salary negotiations. The speaker emphasizes that the power of the parliament must stand behind the government to ensure the subsequent approval of legislative amendments and the budget. Skepticism is expressed regarding the support of coalition members for the draft resolution under discussion, with the focus being on a procedural and results-based framework.
2024-03-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The political position is strongly opposed to the Riigikogu's decision regarding the handling of issues of national importance, as the speaker deems it neither reasonable nor practical. This opposition is justified by procedural inefficiency, legal issues, and the reduction of the powers of the Riigikogu plenary session. The stance is primarily focused on effectiveness and procedural correctness.
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing
The political stance is strongly oppositional, accusing the government of breaking its pre-election promises and "lying." The primary focus areas are security issues (specifically, the voting rights of Russian and Belarusian citizens) and sharp criticism of the government's economic policy (tax increases and energy strategies). The speaker emphasizes that the government's decisions do not serve the interests of the taxpayer or the Estonian state.
2024-03-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The political position focuses on procedural issues concerning the internal representation rights of the Riigikogu and communication between factions. The speaker asks about the Reform Party's willingness to extend the delegation of representation from an unattached MP to representatives of other factions as well. The position is rather procedure-based, testing the logical consistency and scope of the proposal.
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The political focus is centered on Estonian security, emphasizing the need to revoke the suffrage of Russian and Belarusian citizens in local elections, a measure deemed a major threat. This position is strong and value-based, accusing the government of political gamesmanship and inaction at a time when "war is ongoing." The speaker sharply criticizes the coalition's lack of genuine will to change the situation, referencing previous agreements and negotiations.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The political stance is strongly oppositional to the government’s tax policy, which they label a “tax war against its own people.” The main focus is on rejecting the car tax, citing its unfairness and its inappropriateness during an economic crisis. They also fundamentally oppose amendments to the Aliens Act that increase bureaucracy and massively attract labor from third countries. These positions are strongly value-based, emphasizing justice and regional equality.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The political stance is strongly opposed to the government's migration policy, which is viewed as confusing and contradictory, particularly concerning the facilitation of labor coming from third countries. It is emphasized that the government has failed to establish a unified position regarding quotas and immigration, leading to criticism of the differing signals sent by ministers. This position is aimed at criticizing the ineffectiveness of the policy and the government's internal divergence.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The political stance is fiercely opposed to the government's tax increases, particularly the car tax, which he/she has dubbed "foolishness." He/She puts forward an alternative political proposal: abandon the plan to eliminate the tax bracket adjustment (the "tax hump") to prevent the introduction of new taxes. Furthermore, he/she stresses the necessity of improving the procedural efficiency of the Riigikogu's Q&A session (infotund) to guarantee ministers a more equitable response time.
2024-02-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The political stance centers on strong opposition to relaxing immigration policy, viewing it as a threat to both security and social cohesion. The speaker demands a unified and coordinated message from the government and supports tightening control over migration, rather than the mass importation of cheap labor. This position is strongly rooted in values and specific policy, highlighting the state's capacity to integrate new arrivals.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The political stance is sharply critical of the government, highlighting chaos, financial ambiguity, and a lack of decisiveness. Key issues include the State Budget Strategy (RES), the teachers' strike and funding the transition to Estonian-language education, and the question of voting rights for Russian/Belarusian citizens. The focus is on the government's failure to find solutions and clarify actual costs, primarily utilizing a performance evaluation framework when presenting the arguments.